As a developer, I feel that it's easier for me to create good user experience (nice UI, easy non-blocking I/Os by default, etc).
I don't say it's flawless, I say it's now becoming a very good alternative.
As a developer, I feel that it's easier for me to create good user experience (nice UI, easy non-blocking I/Os by default, etc).
I don't say it's flawless, I say it's now becoming a very good alternative.
Is all that bullshit really worth… whatever we're saving? (Our company is mainly saving in developer salaries, because we can force kids fresh out of school to work for minimum wage, instead of hiring experienced developers… we'll see how long this keeps working.)
For some less positive feedback on Atom, which reinforces some of creshal's points, see the Atom section of this text editor rundown:
http://eev.ee/blog/2015/05/31/text-editor-rundown/
I've also frequently seen complaints to the effect that Atom is much too slow, even on machines only a few years old. Even my 486 laptop back in 1997 could run a text editor with syntax highlighting (specifically, JPad for programming in Java). What are editors doing these days that needs so much CPU power?
> http://eev.ee/blog/2015/05/31/text-editor-rundown/
This review (6 months ago) is based on an early version of Atom Editor (0.204.0), the latest stable (1.2.4) is way more mature and provides very nice packages [1].