Spooked: What do we learn about science from a controversy in physics?
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
Everything that is said could be said just as well and more succinctly in a more prosaic manner.
It is a choice to focus more on the form of the content than on the content itself. They could still target intellectuals without having to throw in pointless analogy and other bloated verbiage. It just feels like it's faux-intellectual.