Trouble in the Checkout Line: Which Way to Pay?
wsj.com
wsj.com
I do not understand why the US uses these terrible chip and signature cards, which were a repeated source of frustration for me in Europe this year, since they don't work anywhere.
Maybe they think Americans are too dumb to comprehend a PIN, despite having used them for years on ATMs? If so, why add the time-wasting signature? If we're not doing chip and pin (we should), why not chip and nothing? My signature is a different squiggle every time, there's no way they're doing computer vision on that in time to verify the transaction (if they could even decode it at all).
It's like living in the future!
A signature can easily be faked. The cost of fraud is passed on so best to have it secure.
Not once have I ever considered this to be 'dizzying'
I mean, if you insert the card and it needs you to swipe, it tells you to swipe the card right there on the terminal (or just doesnt have the chip slot on it).
Why dont people just throw their wallets at the register and start curling up into a ball when it doesnt work
Abroad is fun. Some places want my PIN and my signature! Others just one of them, a few nothing.
Side benefit: authorities, tracking companies, banks, "big data analysts" and friends cannot use the information about your shopping behaviour to profile you.
1) Get cash out of bank. At this point, it is possible to record which bills you received from the bank.
2) Spend cash at store.
3) Store deposits cash at bank.
Because of how little a lot of cash tends to circulate before being returned to the banks, it is possible for the authorities to get a fair idea of how you spend your cash. This is still better then cards, but not nearly as good as it looks.
If you also have other people getting cashback at the same register the notes are then spread to someone else before collection.