Does Microsoft really not care when competitors release their own IDEs called * Studio?
Apple Records didn't have a problem with Apple Computer until Apple Computer started selling music.
When Microsoft starting referring to its developer suite as Visual Studio it was using Studio as a catchall for all the development tools it had branded as "Visual" (starting with "Visual Basic" in the early 90s).
Untrue!
> In 1978, Apple Corps, the Beatles-founded holding company and owner of their record label, Apple Records, filed a lawsuit against Apple Computer for trademark infringement. The suit was settled in 1981 with an undisclosed amount being paid to Apple Corps. This amount was estimated to be US$50–250 million, but was later revealed to be $80,000. As a condition of the settlement, Apple Computer agreed not to enter the music business, and Apple Corps agreed not to enter the computer business.
from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps_v_Apple_Computer
Sun Java Studio Creator (ca. 2004) is the earliest non-MS IDE with "Studio" as part of its name that I can think of.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_vs._MikeRoweSoft
I can't tell if this is a joke post. Microsoft would be spanked in a court of law if they even attempted such a silly move.
It's perfectly reasonable to think that if they ever released an Android IDE, either for the mobile OS or for actual androids, it might be called Android Studio.
Android Studio as a development tool for building anthropomorphic robots might be OK whether Google liked it or not ;-)