Tylenol is the perfect example of this. Everyone "knows" that it reduces the risk of heart attacks, because of the marketing campaigns. But what most people don't know is how little of an impact Tylenol actually makes.
Tylenol is the perfect example of this. Everyone "knows" that it reduces the risk of heart attacks, because of the marketing campaigns. But what most people don't know is how little of an impact Tylenol actually makes.
Do you mean Aspirin?[1]
[1] http://www.scq.ubc.ca/should-i-take-tylenol-advil-or-aspirin...
Wait what? Tylenol is acetaminophen, which is not associated with any heart benefit.
If anything long term use of paracetamol is possibly linked to a small increased risk of problems.
http://www.nhs.uk/news/2015/03March/Pages/Is-long-term-parac...
I've never heard a soul mention Tylenol in connection with decreased heart attack risk. Are you sure you aren't thinking about aspirin?
It's also a known blood thinner. Pro wrestlers take handfuls of the stuff before matches they're supposed to be bloodied in, then cut their foreheads open with a blade. The blood loss is superficial and controlled, but it makes for drama.
True, aspirin as a daily regime for people with no CVA/TIA (stroke) or cardiac history is of dubious efficacy, but worthwhile of consideration. It is however, certainly not going to alleviate chest discomfort indicative of an impending cardiac event (or prevent said event).