Gawker's Kinja retreat is more evidence publishers struggle as tech companies
digiday.com
digiday.com
[1] http://www.niemanlab.org/2015/11/how-one-blog-helped-spark-t...
Besides, it's not like there is a shortage of AAA publisher platforms out there. A company like Gawker is also not remotely at the scale that a lot of these platforms can handle: the big thing right now is multi-media CMS that allows a single article to be published online, in print, via syndicated newsfeeds, in multiple languages, etc. Someone like Gawker's business model is far too limited to even address the problems that a lot of publishers have.
Shortly before I left, the CEO started adamantly insisting that it was, in fact, a tech company. It was a nice thought, but underscored how much he did not understand about what that would actually mean. You're not a tech company just because you employ a few people who know what Angular is.
I took some time to try to think of what defines a tech company, and it's hard to draw the lines.
Would be interested to hear what you think.
Technical competency (specifically around APIs and internal platform development) is no longer optional. It's not something you can just outsource to a vendor either; it's got to be a core part of your operating model or else your competitors will steal your clients by being easier to integrate against.
This means that many companies we think of as "tech companies" will need to redefine themselves in terms of the problems they solve. This has started to happen as well - Amazon is a merchant, Microsoft is a business services company, Apple is a consumer electronics company and Google is an advertising vendor. Their tech platforms all exist to support their core businesses - not the other way around. Incidentally, this is why "Google" became "Alphabet" -- new products under the "Google" umbrella were being tainted by its revenue base (and thus, internal political power base - he who controls the revenue makes the decisions) in advertising. Customers just expect a technology-enhanced experience in each of these areas.
I always found Gawker's site and comment system to be quite nice. Though I miss the "old days" back in say 2011.
Who is the competition?
Does anyone know what platform runs sites like Breitbart.com and US Today? I see similar layouts on other websitse.