Hacker News Reader

Comment by olavk | Hacker News Reader

What does "fireworks" mean here? Actual literal censorship, or just people loudly complaining and criticising the expressed sentiment? Because that is the opposite of censorship.

View on HN

A new form of censorship. Neither the reaction of a private party nor the reaction of a government entity, but a death by a thousand cuts. For example, threats to riot or boycott unless someone is fired. Someone 'internet stalking' you and poisoning all sorts of relationships but not by using any illegal means. Entire groups deciding to make an example out of you by means that, had any one person done all of it would have crossed into illegal actions, but which have been split among a group.

There was no censorship on saying a lot of things the puritans didn't like said, but the consequences of saying them could be your life. Nowadays the consequences for saying what you can't say are merely limited to loss of job and any future career in your field and the only media exposure being to solidify how evil you are. See: https://handleshaus.wordpress.com/2013/12/26/bullied-and-bad...

In 20th century America there was also explicit, legal censorship of stuff that would not be a problem today. People were sent to prison for months or years, but this is rarely talked about. See Eugene Debs, Lenny Bruce, William Baird, etc.

A recent example:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-34...

Maybe I'm missing something in this story, but it just seem like a disagreement? Two parties disagreeing about something (like if to mark some particular symbolic day or not) is not censorship.

Overheard three college students at the next table in a restaurant two days ago talking about how free speech is outdated and the Constitution should be changed to limit it so that you can't speak in anyway that was offensive to others.

I was flabbergasted.

These are students who are supposed to be going to school to get exposure to ideas different from their own and learn about the value of freedom of expression especially when it comes to expressing views the majority might not agree with.

I feel like an old man wondering what is wrong with kids today and I'm not that old.

I'm only a half decade out of college and I'm wanting all these whippersnappers off my lawn.

Losing your job and access to employment opportunities is a very common and very effective form of censorship.

OK that is not really what I would call censorship. Censorship is restricting public access to some expression - not punishing the originator. Even if it might be just as bad for the freedom of speech, it is not the same thing.

If the effect is to stifle the speech then functionally how is it different?

Quite different actually. (Even if two things are both bad it does not mean they are the same thing!) For example you can censor a dead author, but you cannot threaten him. And you can punish someone for saying something without censoring the utterance.

https://www.aclu.org/what-censorship

Reply on news.ycombinator.com