NYT changes the there story headlines alot these days ...
After Paris Attacks, C.I.A. Director Rekindles Debate Over Surveillance
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/us/after-paris-attacks-cia...
After Paris Attacks, C.I.A. Director Rekindles Debate Over Surveillance
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/us/after-paris-attacks-cia...
- Article launches with sensational, buzzfeed quality linkbait headline.
- Article gets lots of clicks
- The title is quietly changed to a more restrained version which often matches the print edition title.
At first I thought there must just be different editors overseeing the web and print editions, but now I think it's an intentional form of viral marketing or activist editing.
In some cases, the sensational headlines really diminish the journalistic quality/seriousness of the article, or create the impression that a minor point in the article was the main thrust of the article.
Similarly, there has occasionally been a headline that appears intentionally boring so that the paper can publish a story but effectively hide it from view.
So in a nutshell it's classic misdirection, enabled by the digital medium, since tracks can be fairly easily covered making it harder for those who care/notice to call attention to it. For a while I thought about creating a screenshot archive of changed titles but eventually just stopped reading the paper.
More specifically, the NYTimes public editor wrote about headlines earlier this year: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/public-editor/hey-google-c...