Hello Barbie Security Concerns
kernelmag.dailydot.com
kernelmag.dailydot.com
There is also the added nightmare that comes with private companies having this information available in a way which allows them to correlate the data with individuals- and possibly with the child- in the future.
“...we may on occasion hear or review transcripts of conversations that we can associate with a particular account...”
Comments like this don't exactly instill confidence.
Personally, I would never consider for a moment that this would be a good idea to give to any child, and would actively discourage people who would consider it. It seems ripe for abuse and unknown outcomes, with the main victim being the child who only wanted to play with their toy.
The research cited re: "role playing helps kids cope with traumatic events is independent of a responding doll/toy", is powerful and parents are best served by creating an environment where a doll/toy is a safe place for confidences vs another vector for helicoptering your children.
Ok so that's messed up for obvious reasons, but the worst part is, is that parents won't be learning about their child through play and communication (you know, human things), they're learning about them through some shitty $80 toy.
This is it ladies and gents, the "internet of things"; a cheap toy vying for the spot of parent.
I digress, the thing that really jumped out at me:
"according to a 2010 paper by Elena Smirnova, director of the Center of Play and Toys at Moscow State University, dolls that resemble humans are essential for the kind of role-playing that kids need to do to work through the events of their lives"
I imagine this being lessened if the toy points parameters on the imagination. I know I played with action figures and placed them in pretty fantastical situations but it seems the cheapened by an electronic interaction governor. Perhaps it may enhance it but I'd wager its the former and not the later.
And Sauron must have been a heck of a CEO too.