The only way to stop an ideology is to supplant it with another, better one. I am very sorry that Turkey and the EU did not get very far with the baby steps to accession talks that they took last decade. I believe both parties, the Middle East, and its neighbors would have greatly benefitted from the cultural bridge that would have created, and the PR boost to moderate Islam vis-a-vis Wahabism. It also would have been a great engine of economic growth to both sides, which is actually rather central to the question of terrorism.
As it now stands, we must create a true diplomatic partnership with Iran, and the million-dollar question, figure out what to do about Bashar Al-Assad. Above all, we must avoid the mistakes that plagued the invasion of Iraq.
I will also be waiting with very keen ears to hear the reactions and policy positions of the U.S. presidential candidates, particularly the former Secretary of State.
I am also very interested to see if, during the upcoming climate change talks, any attention will be paid at all by anyone to the link that has been made between a worsening climate and sparks in the Arab Spring.
Finally, the draconian surveillance bill passed by the French this year did not help to prevent these attacks. So it's certainly time to re-evaluate the pros and very large cons of these dragnets.[1] We have yet more evidence that they do not work.
__
[1] http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/24/9030851/france-surveillanc...