Facebook won't let you type this
money.cnn.com
money.cnn.com
TL;DR: tsu.co spams Facebook. Facebook brings the banhammer in the same way they ban every spammy app that does the same thing today, including removing posts of a lady who draws dogs and links to her tsu.co account. Tsu tries to play the victim.
Nothing to see here folks.
As far as the concept of the site... I strongly doubt it's going to succeed in the long run. Tsu's revenue sharing was already tried a bunch of times in the past, there were actually add ons for that sort of thing for many different forum scripts. Sometimes it was based on who made the original post/whose profile it was, sometimes it was based on some sort of percentage system where X percent of the site ads would go to a user based on how active they were.
It usually failed. People treated the site like a source of free money, and the inevitable result was a huge gold rush that ended up bringing in hordes of morons looking to get rich quick by putting in the minimum amount of effort. Fake users, thousands of spammy or low quality posts... it eventually made the world of Idiocracy look like something out of Shakespeare. Digitalpoint was a good example of one of the sites who tried and gave up this idea.
Either way, I'm not surprised they're blocked, and while I wish them the best of luck, I suspect they really won't like the results of this 'revenue sharing' gimmick.
Is it just me, or is this Facebook lying to its users about security? If they want to block it for spam reasons, they should say so.
> "Very few people even know about Tsu," she said. "I don't believe that Facebook and Instagram want Tsu to go viral. it would cost them a lot of money."
Yeah, no kidding. Facebook isn't a public utility, it's a private company whose interests are best served in squashing all competition and doing whatever it can to maximise profit. If anyone is remotely surprised by this, they need to re-enrol in Capitalism 101.
Facebook keeps 100% of ad revenue; Tsu keeps 10% and pays 45% to it's users.
Putting a gun to their heads (which is all a law really achieves) and telling those people that have invested, for their own self interest, that they now have to fund someone else's self interest is in fact, immoral.
Both are software platforms bound by network effects which have reached monopoly situations and then abuse(d) their situation by attempting to use their dominance in one area to reach dominance in another area.
That is still valid - there are no (strong) network effects involved with a web search engine.