Send a $10 Donation by Texting ‘Haiti’ to 90999
redcross.org
redcross.org
Red Cross is a giant beast of a company. It is $600,000,000 in debt. It has ridiculous overhead.
As fellow hackers... We're all trying to build startups/ideas because we think big companies are missing something... that we have a better way to do things... that we can build a better product.
If you want to help Haiti. Give directly. I spent 2 years building a non-profit (a start-up if you will) that sets up volunteer centers in disaster areas. We are a super lean organization with an executive director that takes a $0 per year salary.
Donations are being gathered to directly help the people in Haiti.
Donations Can Be Made Here: http://bit.ly/HODR_Haiti
Sorry to rant... but the RedCross-fest on Twitter right now is killing me.
EDIT: I created a new post with more info here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1051914
What's interesting is that this is higher than the CEO cap the Obama administration placed on for-profit companies which received bailout money.
The Red Cross received $100 million in bailout money.
http://blog.charitynavigator.org/2009/02/non-profit-ceo-pay-...
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary...
The magnitude of CEO pay in the private sector is similarly a non-issue, but please keep my opinion on that to yourselves, lest the pitchforks be redirected toward me.
http://www.slate.com/id/2220596
Non-profits also use their allure of helping others to recruit and often pay rank and file employees less than market rate wages (see some comments in the slate article).
For example, doctors who work for these organizations could likewise be making $100's of K per year. Some doctors also work much harder than their market counterpart, performing more surgeries under difficult conditions.
No thanks, I won't feed that inefficient monster.
You can donate all of $5 in a similar manner by doing this: text 253-83 with the message 'haiti'. They'll send you more info and a confirmation request before you are billed the five bucks.
Friend of a worker there recommended it. I can't vouch for the organization and how they work, and agree with the parent post about overhead, but why not throw 5 dollars into an unknown, in a situation in a country that deserves so much better?
The American Red Cross has $613MM in debt. But it also has $3.5BB in assets. In addition to the aforementioned debt, there are $1.2BB in additional liabilities, for total net assets of:
$1,672,466,000
Source: KPMG consolidated financial statement, June 30 2009.
http://www.redcross.org/www-files/Documents/pdf/corppubs/FY0...
There is an enormous difference between having debt and being in debt.
I support your aims, but the ability to move quickly is essential and it's unclear whether your organization is likely to bring support faster or slower. Could you elaborate?
I think your startup is both good and noble. But I suspect that being a "beast of a company" and having large infrastructure costs is the price we have to pay for an organization to be able to respond immediately to humanitarian crisis on a global scale.
http://www.charitywatch.org/toprated.html#humanserv
Of course, this has a lot to do with economies of scale, and "low overhead" does not immediately imply "high impact per dollar."
They are, however, there. I gave to the Red Cross not just for Haiti, but for something else that will happen. It saddens me I donated because of Haiti, not just for Haiti.
I wish I knew more about operations such as yours. I wish I knew more about the organizations saving lives right now in Haiti. I wish I knew more about organizations and people who take on the lasting sadness after the horror.
I just don't know.
Thank you for giving me another organization I believe will be there.
The Red Cross and UNICEF and other large charities are great, but it's definitely worth remembering that organizations like MSF have been on the ground in Haiti since before the quake.
The following organizations are accepting SMS donations in the US only:
* SMS text “HAITI” to 90999 to donate $10 to Red Cross relief efforts
"""1) Heavy earth moving equipment (to get people out from under the rubble) 2) Tents and blankets (it is cold) 3) Medicines 4) Food
Many organizations only focused on 2 and 4 in India. In the end, there was a glut of food, tents, clothes and blankets and not enough earth moving equipment and many people who could have been saved, died. The situation may be different in Haiti but they are an underdeveloped nation and I doubt they have as much equipment as is needed. I have already seen reports that there's a scarcity: http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2010/0...
Obviously medicine is also in short supply.
It may be a tall order to organize to get this there but at least we have someone here who has done it before. If dariusmonsef (or anyone else) can vouch for a group on the ground in Haiti who can actually manage these things well, it may be worth the effort to try to borrow these things ourselves and try to arrange for comped air transport.
I know some folks in the airline industry who I can ask about transporting the stuff for free.
Do you guys think this is doable and worth the effort?
Also, while charities love to use current events to drive fundraising appeals, their current disaster is almost universally paid for by funds they collected months ago. If you're going to give, give smart. (Relatedly, this is why sending non-monetary goods after a major disaster is perhaps less effective than you might wish it would be.)
Merchants foot the bill for transaction costs to encourage transaction volume. It is the same reason I quote my prices as $29.95 not "$29.95 plus whatever your credit card costs me to process."
edit: http://twitter.com/RedCross/status/7720590281 edit2: beatten
Cell phone providers charge much more.
100% of your $10 donation passes thru to RedCross for Haiti relief. Your cell carrier keeps nothing.Don't they also allow emergency calls for free? (Could be state regulation, but still).
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/aoyin/text_haiti_t...
It's not definitive, but hopefully it'll help people make a more informed judgement about using this short code for donations.
p.s. this charity was mentioned on Reddit:
I'd never heard of it, but the founder, Paul Farmer, has a long history of working in and for Haiti.
pixelsforhaiti / adsforhaiti.org
get sites to donate a small ad block that links to a donation/ways to help haiti page. obviously fully nonprofit. list all other sites/companies involved like they did with the nomoreie6 page. thoughts?
Seems like there's a lot of potential for scammers to tell people to text a certain number without telling people that charges would apply. At the student newspaper I used to work for, we told people to text "follow name" to 40404 (Twitter's short code) to get text message updates with news.
Yet only one muslim country (Kuwait) figures (low down) in the accounts of top 25 donor countries for the IFRC for recent years. But 10 of the top 25 beneficiary countries are muslim. Thus the many of the donations from christian countries to an ostensibly christian emergency relief charity actually end up going to help muslims and are branded as aid from a muslim charity. (Either most of those oil-rich muslim countries aren't giving to charities, or they're only giving to charities that aid other muslims -- and it's probably the latter.)
I have no objection to people receiving aid whatever their religion (or lack of). But it disgusts me that that aid given to a "christian" charity uses the religious imagery of the donating country to raise money and ends up deceiving the recipients into believing it came from a muslim charity.
Donor and recipient end up being deceived by this duplicitous organization. Most people I've talked to about this have no idea that the IFRC is branded as the "Red Crescent" in muslim countries.
I prefer to support Médecins Sans Frontières. They seem far more honest about what they are doing.
The American Red Cross looks like it is not part of this IFRC duplicity.
However, I disagree that anybody is really being decieved at all, it is readily available knowledge that the Red Cross give money under the Red Crescent branding in muslim countries.
It would also make no sese at all to brand themselves at Red Cross in muslim countries - the symbology would have no meaning to the locals at all.
Wikipedia has the basics of setting up a new short code: "Common short codes in the U.S. are administered by NeuStar, under a deal with Common Short Code Administration - CTIA. Short codes can be leased at the rate of $1000 a month for a selected code or $500 for a random code." (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_code)
More info here: http://www.mmaglobal.com/shortcodeprimer.pdf
(I know little about the charity beyond what I read on its website but, again, thought it might be of interest to people here).
Related (via reddit.com): http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/TV/01/13/jimmy.louis.haiti/?...