Scientists develop 'unbreakable' glass almost as tough as steel
ajw.asahi.com
ajw.asahi.com
I'd suggest that all glass is both hard and rigid, so presumably 'tough' is what they're going for. If so, the glass should be able to withstand a large tensile force without fracture or permanent deformation.
'unbreakable' is also a little disingenuous. Everything is breakable, given a big enough hammer ;)
Now a stress-strain curve on the other hand, THAT would be useful.
[1] E = 7.4e7 psi (http://rubicontechnology.com/company/sapphire)
[2] E = 2.9e7 psi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young%27s_modulus)
Toughness(G) = slowly absorb energy without fracture.
Shattering is more dependable of:
Fracture toughness(Kc) = (E*G)^0,5
Where E = modulus. That explains why plastics with low E shatter easily while being tough. Metals have additional hardening methods that allow them to go beyond this rule.
PS. Your knowledge on the subject is already what I'd wish laymen had. So I really don't mean any offense.
Fracture toughness describes relation between maximum tension and maximum depth of pre-existing crack that still doesn't launch phenomena called "fast fracture".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_fracture
It's highly relevant in many cases, because most real world materials have microscopic cracks. And because the load where fast fracture might happen is often lot smaller than yield load.
Curiously Charpy impact test still indicates more toughness than fast fracture. But it's never used to quantify toughness in real life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charpy_impact_test
Thanks for that comment. I need to clear this stuff bit more in my head.
Or time alone with my daughter! "child-proof" isn't a reassurance, it's a challenge
If it is too costly we might only see it used in niche applications (e.g. aircraft windows?). But even then if it weighs more than regular glass it may not even be utilised there.
I'd like to see it used on vehicle front windshields, cracks are a constant pain in the butt, and they can leave the rear window and side windows as regular glass for emergency escape (typically only the front one receives most of the debris). But it really comes back to both weight and cost again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windshield#Safety
Trivia: A famous lawsuit about the safety of windshield glass was the _Pane_ vs. Ford case in 1917
What the article says is that the safety role of a windshield (besides not breaking into dangerous shards of glass) is in being strong enough to maintain the structural integrity of the passenger compartment:
Modern, glued-in windshields contribute to the vehicle's rigidity, but the main force for innovation has historically been the need to prevent injury from sharp glass fragments. Almost all nations now require windshields to stay in one piece even if broken, except if pierced by a strong force. Properly installed automobile windshields are also essential to safety; along with the roof of the car, they provide protection to the vehicle's occupants in the case of a roll-over accident.
Today’s windshields are a safety device just like seat belts and airbags. The installation of the auto glass is done with an automotive grade urethane designed specifically for automobiles. The adhesive creates a molecular bond between the glass and the vehicle. If the adhesive bond fails at any point on the glass it can reduce the effectiveness of the air bag and substantially compromise the structural integrity of the roof.
But yes, this probably would either limit what you can do there or necessitate design changes (just like it would glass with some new properties)
There used to be an issue where people's head would go through a window but the glass wouldn't entirely shatter, so the rest of the body wouldn't go through. A deadly broken window collar
Source: took the same tech class 2 years in a row, and watched some documentary on car safety _4 times_ each year. Yay for American middle school
Laminated glass remains in one solid mass held together by the plastic sheet in the middle, while tempered glass explodes into tiny pieces that are sharp but not overly harmful. Ordinary annealed glass breaks into long, dagger-like pieces that are dangerously sharp, which is why it's tempered or laminated into safety glass.
So the windshield is meant not to break apart, because it's laminated rather than tempered. The polymer lining between the lites of glass prevents it from scattering and causes it to be quite impact resistant. [1] Conversely, you'd really hate to have tempered glass as your windshield, if it broke the entire thing would just pop into tiny pieces that would get into your eyes. If a rock hit hard enough to break a hypothetical tempered windshield, the parts that didn't pop would be filled with cracks and impossible to see through due to being white from being filled with tiny cracks, though you could just bat them out of the way as any parts were partially intact would simply crumble when moved.
The side windows are tempered, incidentally. If you've ever broken a side window, you know what I mean about the whole thing just exploding. [2] If you manage to pop it, the entire window will just fall apart easily, which might be good if you had to leave from the window of a car. It can cause small cuts and scratches and such, but it's not terribly dangerous unless it gets in your eyes, even if, say, a sheet of 3mm, 33 1/4 x 73 1/4 inch glass breaks while you're holding it. [3] It's no fun, but when you compare it to the fact that annealed glass accidents have been fatal, it's not so bad. [4] Yes, I used to work for a glass factory, so when I say that I've seen hundreds of tons of broken glass, the word 'tons' should be understood in the literal, 2,000 lbs sense of the word.
[1] Source: Determined empirically by beating on damaged pieces of it with a shovel, when said pieces wouldn't fit into the dumpster. Or you can read this, whatever: http://sem-proceedings.com/10f/sem.org-IMPLAST-2010-SEM-Fall...
[2] See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPwaq_6aXbo This normally happens only if hit from the corner or an edge, but it can happen just randomly. We usually saw this in winter, but only a few times a year, meaning there was at most about a 1 in 10,000 chance of spontaneous breakage in my experience and probably significantly less based on the average daily volume numbers I remember. When there's something containing the edge of tempered, it sometimes just takes on a white, broken look due to all the cracks, but crumbles to the touch. It tends to just disintegrate like in the video most of the time, though.
[3] Source: Direct, personal experience on multiple occasions for that very size and many others. This is an every-day kind of thing and causes no injury to someone with proper safety gear.
[4] Source: I'm directly aware of at least one such accident where someone was found dead after having their neck cut when attempting to dispose of a cracked sheet. I also provided first aid to someone who could've lost a hand to injury.
You also can't temper any laminate that I know of--the liner would simply melt and cause a mess in the furnace. Our tempering furnace operated in the 700-800F range.
They might seam the edges of the laminate, though, like you do with annealed glass before tempering. I didn't work with windshields, only window glass, including some 6mm clear tempered that went to Google.
The way I would do it would be chemical tempering before laminating. Then you probably have lot less warping.
I'm not familiar with any tempered laminates as we never made such, but a chemical process sounds more reasonable than trying to get laminated glass through a tempering furnace or laminate two tempered lites.
So it's likely it would be around 3,3. More than aluminum, less than titanium.
But it's supposedly about ~20 times more rigid than regular glass. For rigidity limited structure, you could make it so much thinner that you get significant weight savings. This could be important for glass fiber structures. Fiber vs. fiber, glass has been able to compete in strength with carbon fiber, but lack of rigidity is the downside. Increase of stiffness might allow for usage of stiffer "matrix" (glue that holds the fibers together). That should increase overall strength. This limitation exists because if matrix is stiffer than the fibers, the structure will rip itself apart under load.
For strength or hardness limited designs, impossible to say. The article says nothing about it. Alumina is one of the hardest substances around, but I would not make any assumptions based on that. Typically it's more about structure than the molecules involved.
For creep and fatigue resistant designs, bulk glasses are pretty useless because of their amorphous structure. Fibers can be used in fatigue situation though. Again the increase in stiffness and the possible increase of matrix stiffness could improve the situation. But the real thing here is how well the matrix can bind to the fibers. That again is impossible to tell.
Windshields? It's big trade off really. Soft amorphic materials scratch easily. (By definition "hardness" is resistance to identation. Just add movement and you have scratching.) Typically "hard" amorphic materials suffer from cracking. This is because hardness usually comes with decreased ductility. But fracture toughness is function of stiffness and ductility. So this material could(?!?) improve hardness while being about as easy cracking as old windshiels. This would be good idea as windshield is mostly mode of fracture limited design. (It matters more how your windshield breaks, than how much energy it takes to break it.)
It's hard to imagine how a gas-based "containerless processing system" will lend itself to producing the thin, uniform sheets of glass for windows or complex shapes like tableware.
It's a cool prototype, but figuring out how to produce at scale is often the hard part.
edit: yeah...
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla_Glass
Gorilla Glass is a brand of specialized toughened glass developed and manufactured by Corning, now in its fourth generation,[1] designed to be thin, light and damage-resistant. This type of glass is not unique to Corning; similar glasses include Asahi Glass Co. Dragontrail and Schott AG Xensation.[2][3]
The alkali-aluminosilicate sheet glass [snip]
(The link is to asahi.com)
The glass described in the article uses a higher aluminum content than any other mass-produced glass, to the point where any contact with a solid surface would produce alumina crystals rather than incorporate the aluminum into the glass structure.
So they levitated a glass bead with a continuous stream of air until it solidified. The bead is very strong, but they have no idea how to work the resulting glass into fibers or sheets.
Asahi Glass Co. is a separate company to Asahi Shimbun, the news organisation. AGC has a historical connection to the Mitsubishi group through the founder's family, but really is a wholly independent group of companies.
Fiction becoming reality. I thought "transparent aluminum" was just completely made-up nonsense when I saw the movie. Whodda thunk!
Intentional reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_to_eleven#Original_scene_fr... ?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_oxide
Yes, it is technically the stuff you get when you throw aluminum powder over a fire and it lights up and burns brightly. But the crystals you obtain that way are very tiny.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/carmendrahl/2015/11/03/sorry-but...
1. Would this be good for a car? Is having a mostly unbreakable windshield a good thing?
2. How would it handle for cookware? Will it last even if an ignorant person left it in the oven for hours on end?
3. What about uses on phones? Can I have both a scratch resistant touch screen that also doesn't fracture if I drop it 3ft onto asphalt?
4. What does it do in reaction to sunlight? How insulative is it if used in buildings and homes?
5. Is it non reactive for biomedical uses? Does it deteriorate over time? How stable is it?
Pyrex has been around since the 1910s and doing this just fine ever since.
Almost every material known to man will break/crack/shatter/do-something if you rapidly cool it from an elevated temperature.
I see no reason that they needed to be able to see through the walls and look at the Wales inside.
Being a mixture of silicates and alumina, I'll be very surprised if this is not fragile. There's nothing about it on the article.
See one working https://youtu.be/0K8zs-KSitc
Obviously a stronger screen would be great, but a case does wonders if you want a functioning phone for now.
I never had a problem with a phone screen breaking until the 6 plus. My OnePlus is bulletproof.