Neuropolitics: Where campaigns try to read your mind
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
The longer the public takes to understand and react the harder it will be to undo. Already there are organizations that are highly invested in it, from Internet companies to law enforcement and security (and their vendors, such as StingRay) to sales and marketing operations. They will not give up their investment easily.
Clearly these organizations think there is something wrong, or they would openly disclose it and talk about it. But if that's what you want, great - just give me a reasonable way to opt out (i.e., without walking around in a ski mask and with use of modern necessities like telecommunications and public transit).
I'm not trying to doomsay here, only pointing out that this would be far from the most brazen that political campaigns are routinely known to be, both ethically and legally speaking.
I live in Mexico and had no idea this kind of techniques were being used, let alone by politicians.
Recently there has been a lot of enforcement here on privacy policies being displayed physically in places where the business may be collecting your personal data, yet I've never seen an ad saying "I'm recording your reaction and using this for research".
The rise of advertising and focus groups to design products and politics to appeal to emotional desires.
https://vimeo.com/75776128, https://vimeo.com/75779119 (pt2), https://vimeo.com/10245146 (pt3), https://vimeo.com/75784765 (pt4)