SGI screen fonts converted for OS X
njr.sabi.net
njr.sabi.net
Also, having unicode glyphs is more important now that it was before. If my font can't show "άꚍαραξία", or "∀ a,b,c ∈ ℝ³", I think I am missing something, even if it looks good.
Droid Sans and Deja vu Sans look perfect to me. But I never got to use an actual SGI, so maybe I'm missing something about the technical advantage of using these fonts.
I usually use the 6x13 font from here: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html - all the Unicode you can eat!
(I think it's nicer than the 6x13 SGI one (Screen 13pt on OS X) which is a bit cramped-looking. The 7x14 SGI one (Screen 14pt on OS X) is much better - looks like basically the same glyphs as 6x13, but with an extra pixel breathing room.)
I agree; when I first used an LCD, the best part of the experience was how sharp everything looked. On a CRT the pixels were somewhat blurry no matter what, but the LCD made the pixels actually look like little squares and it felt like my eyes were in focus. I can stand antialiasing on large fonts but small text looks better to me without AA, and subpixel AA just makes me feel dizzy since my eyes seem to be continually trying to focus to get those sharp edges.
Misc-Fixed is my favourite font too, although I've modified mine with a slashed zero to make 0 and O more distinctive.
In the time these SGI fonts were new --- really up through the turn of the century -- the case for pixel programming fonts was better, I think, especially when you used light text on a dark background; our "high-resolution" displays were rarely more than 75 dpi with 18-bit color. But as historically important as unaliased 9-point Monaco may be, I'm not going to use it for nostalgic purposes.
http://www.typewritten.org/Media/Images/nextstep-1.0.png
It would be funny if this font is indeed just coming full circle.
The old NeXT font is actually very close to dear old Monaco: http://i.imgur.com/Cf1xED2.png
Wish there was something similar for Windows 10.