Hacker News Reader

Correlations are evidence.

Correlation is not causation.

That is true, but the book does not just provide correlations.

What does it provide?

It provides explanations for the correlations, and then backs up these explanations with references that support the effect they're implying.

Taking a quick glance at the book, they are over 400 such references made in the text.

I don't need 400 arguments. I need single good one.