Wunderground generally feels clean and on-topic.
Weather.com is often filled with "Doomsday scenario with newest hurricane season" and "Check out this massive shark jumping" news stories.
Wunderground generally feels clean and on-topic.
Weather.com is often filled with "Doomsday scenario with newest hurricane season" and "Check out this massive shark jumping" news stories.
They probably didn't want the competition anymore because I don't think the Weather Channel has learned a damn thing about how to run a clean website since acquiring Wunderground. On the plus side, it appears they have left Wunderground to do their own thing and not interfere.
More than that now, I ran into a guy in the Haight wearing a WUnderground fleece about 3 years ago, right after the buyout and told him it was my favorite weather website and that I hoped Weather.com wouldn't ruin it.
He then told me he was on the Weather.com team who led the buyout -- Oops. He still offered to send me a WUnderground hoodie though, so kudos to him for having a sense of humor.
First article I found re: the buyout in 2012;
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/04/us/as-weather-channel-buys...
Any extraneous stuff I notice but filter out automatically. I love the site and don't have any of the sort of issues you've described. I do seem to have a higher tolerance for the minor inconveniences of life when I compare my experience to those of the people who surround me, so maybe I'm just lucky. I think you can develop this attitude though, and it sounds like it would help ease your way through the world.
The only issue I described was extraneous noise on the website (most of which has nothing to do with weather). It's just less usable/aesthetically pleasing than the alternatives.
I'm not losing sleep over it or anything. I just use the alternative site instead.