It has figures for total stores and stores with pharmacies, and it looks like it is either most or all.
You aren't going to match Walmart on $4.00 generics and have success, but often times independent chains get better discounts on everything else than many of the major chains.
Aaah, that I did not realize. But still, it seems like there's a fair amount of competition among pharmacies in the general sense. I suppose that in specific geographic locales that may not be as true though.
And I'm not saying that this merger is unilaterally a "Good Thing" or anything. It just doesn't strike me as a place where anti-trust specifically comes into play.
Not to mention the airlines, and I just paid a month's rent to visit my parents for Thanksgiving, which I was forced to do because, you know, grandparents have an expiration date, and Thanksgiving is practically a holy day in our family.
I'm tired of it. Monopolies are real, and they tend to be bad for the people they purport to serve. But this is a power feedback loop that has tipped over the edge and probably gotten past control. Where are our checks and balances?
http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/airfares/programs/economics_and_...
To add to this point. My wife just got a ticket from Atlanta to Indianapolis for 49 dollars round trip. . . You can't drive from Atlanta to Indy for 49 dollars.
It's simply demand in the holiday case, but it's still ridiculous. At other times, high demand does not necessary apply and they do all kinds of things to generate demand and compete for butts in seats, especially when fuel prices are low.
But with a high-demand holiday, at a hub almost entirely monopolized by one airline, there is no ceiling to how high they can raise price in response to that demand.
Norwegian has incredible fares also, many I've seen for less than $400 round trip Los Angeles to various destinations in Scandinavia.
[0] http://freakonomics.com/2011/06/24/why-do-airlines-always-lo...