1. breaches that qualify are often written off by the underwriter as "gross negligence" or other such behavior which basically allows them to nullify the contracts and pay nothing
2. situations where the breach could be covered by the terms of the insurance are incredibly rare. Most situations where SSL compromise is at risk would not be covered. The insurance only helps you if the CA causes you damages through their own actions. In one of the most famous cases, the breach of the CA DigiNotar, the underwriter said that DigiNotar misrepresented themselves and invalidated all their policies.
Also, an https cert has nothing to do with data breaches :)
It would definitively compromise the identity/trust part of it.
"An attacker who could subvert any single one of those certificate authorities into issuing a certificate for a bogus public key could then mount a "man-in-the-middle" attack as easily as if the certificate scheme were not used at all."