Hacker News Reader

Comment by steveridout | Hacker News Reader

I owned an A500 and later a pimped out A1200 (with an 80Mb hard drive!) back in the 90s and really loved them. I learned programming using AMOS and Blitz Basic. I dabbled with 3D modelling and rendering using Imagine. And of course there were so many awesome games - Lemmings, Populous, Civilisation, Monkey Island, Mega-lo-Mania, Speedball 2, Worms, Sensible Soccer, Hired Guns, the list goes on...

But around the time Doom was released on PC, it seemed like the Amiga's graphics performance, once so ahead of its time, had fallen far behind. I switched to a Pentium 60 PC and apart from the occasional twang of nostalgia have never looked back.

I'm really curious what the motivation is for those die hard Amiga fans and hackers now, so many years later. Is it nostalgia, the community, the technical challenge of working within the system's limitations? What is keeping you around?

View on HN

I had an Amiga 2000 with 2 floppy drives and 3 MB of RAM and later an Amiga 1200 with a 120 MB hard drive (ha! beat you!). This setup suited me well also after I got to the university for doing programming homework on them and using the university Sparc machines for internet surfing. I only got a Linux machine in 1999.

So I'm not really part of the active Amiga community but I'm following loosely by reading http://amiga-news.de/ and listening to BoingsWorld, a German Amiga podcast (http://boingsworld.de/).

I think there are about 3 different groups of Amiga fans.

1. the hardware group 2. the emulation group 3. the demo group

IMHO the hardware group is the one group who wants to run something Amiga-like on their vintage (68k) or slightly vintage (PPC) hardware. Those people get a kick out of having a useful and fast system without all the cumbersome and inefficiencies of modern systems.

The emulation group just wants to use the old software or play the old games. Those usually don't care about the non-68k systems as it is much easier nowadays to emulate the old systems with one of the UAE forks.

The demo group uses whatever system they have to produce stunning demos. Getting new cool effects out of 30 year old systems is really amazing and shows what an incredible machine the Amiga still is.

I think A-EON mostly serves the hardware guys.

It's even more sub-divided than that... It's really fragmented.

On the hardware side you have people that want something they will deem as "classic enough". Basically it at least needs to be 68k, possibly with PPC card, and various extents of modern expansions (some of which may not leave much of the original machine in actual use...)

You also have a number of people who care about the architecture for various reasons, but don't care about the actual hardware. There you'll find a number of FPGA projects. There is some overlap here, though.

Then you have the PPC crowd which is split between MorphOS and OS4. OS4 users has been A-Eons primary market given that they are selling actual new PPC hardware (with a second design underway), though they've lately started adding more products for classics, and have been courting MorphOS people too. MorphOS runs on various second-hand PPC hardware.

Then as you say there's the people who are fine with emulation.

Then you have AROS, which is largely hardware agnostic (ports to ARM, PPC, 68k, x86).

Within this there really are a lot of different motivations. E.g. you find classic users who just want to play games, but there are also hardcore classic users who try to use classic Amigas as their main computers.

Out of interest, is Natami still a thing? Anything come of CloneA (aside from that scan doubler that used some of its AGA implementation)?

I haven't followed Amiga developments for a while, last I remembered it appeared the Natami project was parked due to some differences in direction, with the project to create a new 68k FPGA CPU splitting off into a separate project.

I noted that the Minimig AGA core reached v1.0 this year, which is good news, is compatibility fairly good now?

https://code.google.com/p/mist-board/

Who knows what's going on with Natami. Basically they've went off in different directions, and lately the forum for the Apollo core (the 68k FPGA cpu) was wiped. Whether that means they've given up or just decided they don't want to talk to anyone is anyones guess... I would say that at this point any good news from that camp will be a nice surprise rather than something anyone should hold their breath over.

I've not kept up with the Minimig cores. I'm more interested in AROS (though I check in on the FPGA projects now and again because I find them fun to read about), but have had very little time for that too lately.

Oh, how could I forget AROS? I had a few years ago a blast during a week-end while porting NetHack to AROS. The development tools at the time weren't up to current standards but I got a kick out of "programming like it's 1989". For 2 days at least. I wouldn't have to do it on a regular base. :)

AROS is a bit odd, as they are trying to build a full-blown OS although most of the people are probably running it in the hosted version on Linux.

IMO using one of the free unixoid OS as foundation with AROS on top would make more sense. I'm sad that Amithlon didn't work out.

Using classic Amiga as main computers is a hardcore task. I can see that it is not impossible to achieve with PPC Amigas and MorphOS or OS4. But for an 68k Amiga, I don't think it's possible without severe limitations.

I still build stuff for my favourite computer which was 8-bit from the 80s. I owned Amiga's after that but they did not give me the same feel. For me to stick to those massively underpowered computers seems to be that I find the hardware more interesting; with my limited free time I still understand all the hardware and can extend it, work on it; you can create mostly anything with 74series ICs and understand why it works after that. The closest comparable experience are FGPA/CPLD's but 74series are 'free' (you can find cubic meters of them on boards at your local garbage disposal or 2nd hand market or almost free on 2nd hand sites) and they look much better :)

This goes for the software as well; I understand that system in and out and I can build a simple OS from scratch (in assembler or C) and low level demos from scratch in days. The limitations make it interesting what the possibilities are; being clever with assembler and hardware can lead to very interesting results 'formerly not possible'.

For me the best 8-bit example is the actively developed; http://www.symbos.de

Then again; I would not know why you would make new hardware instead of going for the originals; it's not really the original feel / idea at least for me.

I really don't get it.

Although I personally did not own one, all of my friends did. I was the PC dude of the group.

So I got to use it when we gathered for some coding/gaming sessions back then.

The whole experience was awesome, how the OS and hardware were integrated together, the programming hardware that was available, some of the OS concepts like the libraries.

However in 2015, given the current computer architectures, I think nostalgia could be the only reason.

I was the same, yet I continued to invest in the Amiga in the vain hope that it would come back from the brink, in hindsight I should have jumped ship then too, I stuck with the Amiga until the 2000ish

The Amiga 1200 is the only computer I really took from The Netherlands to China. The rest could be bought and replaced... nostalgia can not ;-). I had almost all of the machines and still left many back at my parents home (several A500, CDTV, CD32, A2000, etc).

I hope my kid will appreciate some of those games as mentioned in other posts. sighs

It's not a surprise considering when Doom was out, Amiga (Commodore) was in its last days. Amiga 1200/AGA was a beast in its day. I still have that mental image of it being powerful. Which is funny, considering that system is barely (not) able to play an mp3. Consider that fact for a moment.

To be fair, the parent's Pentium-60 was also struggling with playing an MP3 file during that time as well.

It wasn't Doom that convinced me to switch from the Amiga to Wintel, it was MP3. My P100 was adequate but you weren't doing a lot of other things during playback.

To be fair, the parent's Pentium-60 was also struggling with playing an MP3 file during that time as well.

Of course. I find it amusing that a machine that we deemed as so powerful (020/AGA) and on which we saw such nice graphical exhibitions isn't powerful enough to run 44KhZ/128Kbit mp3. It's more of a testament of time and Amiga itself (it was powerful!).

The Amiga had a far superior OS and user experience than PCs at the time, and for a long time in fact.

I think the hardware was really fun to work with. It had the copper processor and blitter which were programmable and powerful, and their use/abuse enabled really cool looking effects which drove the demo scene.

The 2d games still looked better and moved faster than on games for a good few years until directx and graphics cards started to catch up, and of course with 3D the pc win with brute cpu power

You just described exactly my 90s computing experience. AMOS was great wasn't it? The only difference is my hard drive was 60Mb and the PC I switched to was a Pentium 100.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com