Ways to improve gender equity in the tech sector
newsroom.ucla.edu
newsroom.ucla.edu
The first proposed "solution" merely promotes participation rates as a measure of gender equity, and the 2nd proposal "Provide female entrepreneurs with..." just adds another form of inequity. Only the 4th proposal seems truly gender neutral and constructive.
It's easier to chase metrics than fix problems. Any many are deaf to the possibility that equal treatment would not yield equal participation.
I don't care what your personal politics on gender equality are - if you're making your employees work sixty-hour weeks you're functionally identical to Pat Buchanan.
One of the biggest ones is to make sure that you actually clearly communicate what you want out of an employee. If you expect someone to be doing more work than someone else, but they have the same title.. you may want different titles. Or clear (and public!) pay grades that signify seniority if you don't want MTS1 MTS2 MTS3 MTS4 MTS5 MTS++ style titles.
Companies, especially small ones, that skirt performance review policies as either unimportant or "too formal" can lead to a lot of incidental/accidental discrimination that goes unnoticed until it's too late.
Let's not bring race into this. Not unless said employee was making comments/opinions such as "I'm white, therefore I deserve more" or "I expect more because I'm white".
At the very least, you would have no idea to the motives behind his higher expectations (or the other person's lower expectations).
Constructing the necessary exercises and evaluations is a lot more work than traditional interviewing, especially if you also want to avoid the "silly puzzle questions that only prove you read the same book" syndrome, but it is possible and would avoid most kinds of bias.
Your job postings are quite rightly designed to filter out people that lack the skills you are after. However they also serve as an unwitting barrier.
One thing I have seen that is successful is actively going out and recruiting people who are different from you. Universities are a great source of untapped talent. More importantly they haven't been beaten down by classism/sexism/*ism.
Being surrounded by people who look, act and sound like you is a boring boring life.
Realize that framing your daughters behavior by giving her babies, princesses, dolls, makeup, clothes and similar to play with, while your boy gets the newest action games, puzzles, balls, competitive and brain engaging fun, will definitely influence her future career choices.
When you take your daughter to look at some princess movies, or some toy story thingy, while you watch star wars and star trek with your son, long into the night, think of what kind of framing is done.
Of course, even if you try to keep all the options open. Someone from her school might make your daughter do "girls only" activities. Or maybe she'll be forbidden from accessing the Star Wars room at Legoland because she's a girl. Whole world is against your little girl becoming like a man. She needs babies so she knows she has to be a mother. She needs kitchen games so she knows she has to cook. She needs to play with dolls, to groom them, to dress them, so that she eventually does the same for herself. She needs to be pretty, and by pretty we mean makeup.
If someone is naive enough to believe that boys and girls have innately different interests, then so be it.
But girls ain't "gurls" because they don't like technology.
http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/you-can-giv...
http://www.livescience.com/22677-girls-dolls-boys-toy-trucks...
Its been shown that male monkeys prefer boys toys while females prefer girls toys. No cultural conditioning required.
http://animalwise.org/2012/01/26/born-this-way-gender-based-...
Can you cite any studies that support your claim?
I've met a number of people who espouse views similar to yours. You believe you're sticking up for girls, but all the kids hear is that girly stuff is 'bad' and boy stuff is 'good'. Someday you might know a girl who really just wants to take care of babies. Do you think she is entitled to have that view? How would she take comments like yours? Will she think that because her goals are 'bad' that she is 'bad'. How would a boy who wants to take care of babies react when everyone sees baby toys as lesser? Do you think they will feel free to be more feminine? Or pressured to conform even further. You're reinforcing what you believe you oppose.
I'm just saying that there's crazy amount of conditioning here, and that people might unconsciously make choices for their daughters that will lead them to a very different life.
I am also saying that there's crazy amount of pressure from kindergarten teachers, and who knows what other environments.
> Do you think she is entitled to have that view? How would she take comments like yours?
My comment was pretty much black&white. I'm not advocating pressure. I'm painting my views this simple to evoke questioning of one's choices regarding raising children.
Realistically, women do not go into tech do to tech looking unattractive to women. Women find this men dominant field unattractive for reasons that are mostly based on early conditioning. It's not that they are incompetent, they just do not try.
Do you think that life will be worse than if their upbringing was optimized to turn them into engineers? Playing devil's advocate... traditional gender roles must hold some value otherwise people wouldn't adhere to them. There are also many women who enjoy what would be considered a traditional role. I think this push to get women into tech at all costs is stealing quite a bit of agency from people who are exerting their free will (both in career choice and child raising technique).
If you believe I'm advocating for women being raised to become engineers then you and everyone else who downvotes me is silly.
I'm talking about gender roles. They are here, they aren't changing, and no, you cannot do anything about women equity in tech without changing the values that are ingrained in human culture.
It does sound like you are advocating for changing traditional gender roles. Maybe you think there are other benefits to doing that beyond increasing tech adoption for women? All I'm saying is that there are positives associated with existing gender roles and working so hard to change them while ignoring the negatives that will come about doesn't seem wise.
Have you seen this case that many college psychology courses cover? http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/files/gender_reassign...
Wow really?
There you have one, and in the same city as you! At my previous workplace (in Barcelona) there was a Taiwanese programmer, and before that in London I met many Asian (mostly Chinese) programmers.
That kind of setup is not uncommon. I have been asked to work in windowless rooms, which I rejected. I have worked in ugly industrial areas and ugly buildings. I have worked in the basement that wasn't officially suitable for human use (only legal for storage).
After 6 hours, my eyes hurt from the strain of looking at HTML and Javascript all day, trying to find tiny mistakes in the source code. But I have at least 2 more hours to go. Human interaction is minimal - yes there are meetings, but that is not the same as human interaction that for example a doctor sees.
Sure, jobs at Google or Facebook might be fancy. But even at big companies (including Google) I have seen those big open plan offices. They just had more colorful toys lying around at Google. And most devs won't work for Facebook or Google.
Why do I put up with it? Because I need the money to feed my family, and I can not easily switch to another profession. This is probably controversial and will give me downvotes, but most women don't need to work to feed their family - their husbands do that. So they are not forced to put up with smelly, crowded, windowless rooms for years and years on end. And women can easily switch profession, too: they can simply become mothers, which 40% choose to do (become fulltime moms, that is - more women become mothers of course).
I enjoy programming for my own projects, but most dev jobs I did for money were gruesome.
Note that this gruesomeness affects women and men in the same way. There are no offensive Star Wars posters or other Geeky things lining the walls. The environments just tend to be less comfy, because devs only stare into their computers anyway.
The notion always seems to be that the women who shy away from tech end up leading "wasted", brainless lives as housewives. Not so. They become doctors, or journalists, or liberal arts people (and btw., housewive and spending time with your kids is not all that bad either).
I understand if companies want to lure women into tech, because it gives them a greater talent pool and lower wages (because of greater supply). But it is not an issue of equality.
But we shouldn't push out people who want to do it. We don't tell boys not to.
And I am honestly torn about recommending it to my son. I will (try to) teach him programming for sure and even hope to encourage him to earn money on the side while at school. But for real professions, there might be better options to consider. Oh, and I will also do the same for my daughter, of course, it's just that your claim was about what we recommend to boys. I will also teach my daughter not to listen to the feminists.
I will teach them because that is something I have knowledge about, and I think kids should benefit from their parent's specialties if possible. If I were a designer I would teach them design, if I were a musician I would teach them music, and so on...
You've never spoken to conservative parents, then.
In any case, where are the campaigns targeted at parents, if it is such a big worry?
We MUST to do something about this! People of a certain gender cannot prefer some activities over others!
This is ridiculous.
If you cross reference the countries by religion and their rating on gender equality, you will notice the most religious countries are some of the most inequal.(http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2014/ran..., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations#...) This doesnt mean both are related of course, but if you think beliefs about moral affect behavior you would expect to see this type of correlation.
Im prepared to get downvoted for my opinion on the detriments of religion here so have at me :)
EDIT: If you downvote please say why? Id like to see good counter argument.
It's one step away from unironically using the term "SJW".
That it backfired on them does not retroactively invalidate it. The same happened with the Tea Party and "teabagger".
With that fucked up world-view Vivek Wadhwa is a misogynist woman hater suddenly out of the blue.
You need to take a step back and realise that there might be some different views and solutions to the same problems instead of painting PEOPLE as problems.
The fact that you don't see that that is exactly what posting that comic does is mind-numbingly myopic.
> You need to take a step back and realise that there might be some different views and solutions to the same problems
Right back at you good buddy.
Also, what's up with the changing hair color?
I've a niece whom I absolutely adore. I try to steer her now and then to software development as a career. She's 14 so I don't expect much focus out of her, but her curiosity for it just doesn't seem to be there. Her brother is 11, and it couldn't be more obvious to me that he is much more adept at tinkering, even though I've never broached the subject with him. My niece will usually agree with me so I'll stop talking, then go on facebook or netflix or look up kardashian news (not a stereotype, this is 100% what happens). I'm still trying to figure out a way to reach her, but so far every effort has been met with active disinterest. She says she likes the perks that I seem to get (flexible hours, work from home, decent pay, etc.), so at least there's hope she could still be drawn to that eventually
My oldest son dragged me into playing Master of Magic by telling me "It is like SimCity (my favorite game)." and helping me play it to emphasize the civilization building aspects. :-)
(Edit: I'm his mom.)
"We need more women in STEM... even if we have to drag them kicking and screaming", said no one ever.
That's not to say you should force your kids to follow the career of your choosing. Nor is it to say it's necessarily because of the above that they have developed such interests.