Off topic : Is it ok to re-post an ignored article [0] the very next day, just curious, not complaining :)
Hi there,
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10443814 looks good, but didn't
get much attention. Would you care to repost it? You can do so
here: https://news.ycombinator.com/repost?id=10443814.
Please use the same account (jgrahamc), title, and URL. When these match,
the software will give the repost an upvote from the mods, plus we'll
help make sure it doesn't get flagged.
This is part of an experiment in giving good HN submissions multiple
chances at the front page. If you have any questions, let us know. And
if you don't want these emails, sorry! Tell us and we won't do it again.
Thanks for posting good things to Hacker News,
DanielI can't help but wonder what the logic is there.
It seems like we're reaching a "web 3.0" which uses users to do the expensive bit of an intial sift but then the site admins edit/curate that into their own vision.
We're moving away from user driven content, back to curated content with user-sourcing.
As Jeff Atwood says about StackOverflow, it should be possible for a sufficiently privileged user to do just about anything staff can do.
Not really a new concept as /. had the notion of metamoderation, but a richer model with multiple levels of user.