Work on stuff that matters, first principles (2009)
radar.oreilly.com
radar.oreilly.com
This is incredibly naive. It would be condescending too if the author hadn't meant otherwise. People are forced to work for money - they don't want to!
I don't want to care about money. I want to care about other things, but unfortunately I have to eat, sleep inside shelter, bathe, save for retirement, etc.
I literally have enough savings to last 4 months before being homeless. How am I supposed to go make make music and work on my own programming language, with the understanding that I'll be destitute in a matter of months? Hearing shit like "just do what you love" is insulting. Incredibly insulting.
Yeah Mr. O'Reilly? Why don't you send me a big fat check so I can work on what matters. Not everything that matters to people is something they can build a huge business out of.
One way to do this is instead of watching TV, playing WoW, etc, that is, instead of pleasant but exclusively consumer activities. Seen at this angle, the advice does not look all that bad.
This is not unlike having kids. You don't quit work to have kids; to the contrary, you work harder to give the kids a head start (nice toys, good books, advanced kindergarten). You don't stop working for money, but you spend the money for what you love more than money. If this works for your child, it could also work for your brainchild (which is often less demanding, too).
It's not like I choose to watch TV at night instead of building some dream lifestyle business.
How would you propose I monetize creating my own free open-source programming language? "Just don't play WoW" doesn't make sense in these scenarios. Contrast that with the passion of "publishing books". Starting a publishing company would be an obvious choice.
But flexibility helps. You could, for example, make a living working on V8 or SpiderMonkey, and work on your programming language as a hobby.
Forget it, work for the man, save your money, retire young, then work as much as you want on your GIF art syntax programming language.
Or even substantially less than half of that.
The truth however is that many people don't have a "what matters", a single burning passion or idea. Most want a comfortable life in which they can convince themselves that they are ahead of their peers and they don't lack for anything important. It is incredibly sad to see how much crap some people deal with at work to have these lifestyles.
What matters to me? A very small number of people, a lot of solitude and a lot of learning and playing with my mind. To do this I have a job at a very small company with a custom contract to work just four days a week - for this I have taken a cut in pay of course. As a by-product there are lots of things I can't afford that my "peers" can but the funny thing is they are insistent they can't afford the time to learn the piano or take the long weekend to see their dying parents, they haven't visited the local national parks or escaped the intensive weekend shopping.
That is interesting, and something I would want to explore in the future (I am currently a college senior). How did you manage to convince your company to do that?
-- Fred Wilson (also credited to Nassim Taleb)
As an example, at the top of that list would be relocating to a lower cost area. Residing in NYC/SF/BOS/TOK/LON is a choice that forces one onto the hamster wheel.
This cannot be emphasized enough. There are lots of good jobs and good areas to live that will not force you to spend absurd amounts on small rental properties, let alone half-million dollar or more homes. A lot of middle America is actually pretty nice to live in, and near the big cities that have the culture people might want, while costing a fraction of what NYC or SF cost. And the salaries aren't that much lower. You may have a hard time getting to six-figures in some of these places, but your $80k a year salary will go a lot further than $150k in SF.
And the jobs offer a great deal for having a lifestyle that isn't centered on work, in my experience. Leaving at 4 is not frowned upon, by most, and you get essentially a second day to spend doing what you want, or with the family.
> This is incredibly naive.
It is incredibly challenging - given the economic and social constraints of 'modern' life.
Your rant sounds incredibly petty and insulting to me. You seem to be confusing momentary pleasure for love. They are not the same thing.
I am just saying: You have 4 months of savings in the bank and are whining about how you can't afford to pursue your music. I am pursuing better health, in spite of the entire world seemingly being against me.
Being further dismissed by your reply to me doesn't make me think any better of your initial comment.
Ironic that you would be so openly ugly to someone worse off than you after starting your argument from a place of accusing O'Reilly of being overprivileged and stating he should give you a big check so you can work on things that "matter" -- to you and no one else at all.
But it also isn't surprising.
I'm done here.
I can think of no reason to believe he is intending this advice to apply to every person on the planet, or you in particular.
See, he acknowledges the importance of money. But once your basic needs are met, you can start discovering what matters to you. Music and creating your programming language are just to points in a huge space of things you could potentially enjoy. There are many jobs that, even though they don't sound sexy, allow you to explore this space and gravitate to things you like. The choice is not always between being a slave or dying from starvation.
I work a corporate gig, getting paid below what many on this forum might consider appropriate, because I live in an affordable area, near family and friends, and the job doesn't ask anything of me after my 8 hours are done.
That last part is most important. The things that I was passionate about when programming was my life (I got a bit burnt out), were not things I could have gotten a job doing (easily) without a graduate degree, something that I found I didn't have the emotional fortitude to get through. So I did them as hobbies after hours. Now, programming isn't a passion of mine so much. I'm rediscovering old interests (languages, martial arts, travel, art) that had fallen by the wayside.
When I leave work at 4 (most days), I go do whatever the hell I want. Now, if you're not single and childless like me, this isn't as easy to do. But if you are, it's pretty much trivial. Pick your priorities, and do them. Right now, for me, it's fitness first (most days). I go for a run or cycling, then go to a fight gym for a couple hours. It's a lot more than is needed just to stay healthy, and more than I'll be doing in a few more months, but I enjoy doing it. I'm traveling to Italy, so I'm learning Italian. This is easy to do with just my downtime. I use Memrise and Duolingo, this weekend I'll be looking into Italian podcasts to listen to on my commutes.
You may not be able to make a living performing music, but are you good enough to get hired out for gigs? I have several coworkers that play instruments in bands in this area. They don't get a lot for their gigs, but it's more than nothing and covers the cost of their equipment and lets them do what they really want, perform.
Plenty of people (based on Show HN posts) seem to have made their programming languages without monetizing them. It may require a time sacrifice (you can't go out with your friends most weeknights, because the language is your "second job"), but it can be done.
As you consider what you're doing through the years, consider what matters to you, your employer, their customers and users, and society. You may or may not be able to satisfy all of them, but they're all interested stakeholders.
What matters to you should come first, because you may not give something the effort it deserves if it doesn't matter to you.
Is there some article/post where O'Reilly gives the background?
In the article, the above sentence contains a link, but it is surprisingly unhelpful. It leads to a Google search. The first hit is this article. The second is a video I have neither the time nor the inclination to watch. The third is basically a collection of quotes. The fourth and fifth are comments on a talk O'Reilly gave. The sixth is just a wrapper around a link to this article. The seventh is another comment on a talk. The eighth is another video. And I'm getting tired of clicking on useless links.
Here's a video where he elaborates:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc7Z5gmwXOg
I'm working on research for an open data project and have been revisiting thousands of bookmarks I'd saved over the years. Decided to read it again and was struck with how relevant it still was six years after he wrote it. Kind of true with both PG's and Tim's essays is that they are both timeless.
Everything else pales in comparison to that and if you are 'working on stuff that matters' don't forget those two, they really should come first.