YouTube Suspends Kid's Account, Gets Porn Fest In Protest
npr.org
npr.org
Why am I mentioning this? Because of the "Myth of the Superuser," the tendency of the media to exaggerate and lawmakers to overreact to the power of pranksters online. I refer to this paper by Paul Ohm: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=967372
4chan in particular tends to be sensationalized so often, so it's good to keep the right perspective.
To me this highlights a very interesting conflict in today's society. There is a very strong "protect the children" argument. I constantly worry that this premise results in a caste system where being under 18 effectively renders you a second-rate citizen.
If you're under 18 the world is mainly full of STFU and GTFO. Much like the result of this kid's interactions with YouTube.
Seriously I thing that being a bit of protective over kids is not that a bad thing at all. Of course I'm not saying that childhood should be a prison or something but some due parenting is totally fine. I know that I did a lot of stupid things when I was a kid (without my parents knowledge), who knows what sort of stuff I would've done if I was actually allowed to do them?
I don't quite know why, but I was struck by this phrase when I read the article. It almost seems to be saying something the definitions of our 'real life' identities as opposed to, or in addition to, our online personas. It's almost assuredly unintentional, but it made me pause to reflect for a moment.