I disagree. The language is readable, if not intuitive. Once you read the tutorial, the examples all make sense. The intial example given is like a minified version of the code, and is probably not a good first impression.
I imagine myself having to read a couple of programs written in this language. It looks cluttered.
Which doesn't mean I think the concepts of the language are bad.
It now just looks like an explosion of \,],['s.
Compared to ruby/python, sure. Compared to c/c++/erlang eh, not so much.
Erlang becomes easily readable once you wrote a few dozen lines yourself.