This story is extremely relevant to the general discourse here, and I am interested in peoples opinions. No dog in the fight, but I know people on both sides.
I don't have a problem with your trying to draw attention to this story, but the lack of any substantive reporting on the case is puzzling and makes discussion difficult.
Please note that SAS employs 5,479 people in Cary, NC.
I'm sure it can't have escaped the attention of the defense lawyers.
This article doesn't have a whole lot of info on what is really going on.
But why is it news worthy that a US court would NOT allow testimony that a UK and Europe court found it lawful? So these other courts found that it was lawful in the US?