It was a pleasant surprise to read a balanced article related to climate change.
Why is this a pleasantly balanced article relating to climate change? Just because it points out that rising temps was a possible factor (amongst others) for a lobster population boom? Don't worry at least we've got lots of lobster.
Did you keep reading until the bit where that temperature sweet spot for lobsters might have already been exceeded, and it could be one of the factors that might now be adversely affecting lobster breeding?
The article was about lobsters and the multiple hypotheses on why the population exploded and why/if it might soon collapse again.