100M games played
en.lichess.org
en.lichess.org
For more info, see http://lichess.org/blog/U4skkUQAAEAAhIGz/why-is-lichess-free
Also note that we suck at marketing, but it doesn't matter, since we don't do it at all.
There are great open source tools out there for analyzing/simulating games that can be hooked up to the proposed site (http://quackle.org for example). Both of the aforementioned programs (the EA one, and ISC) have very elementary analysis with nothing close to look-ahead.
I've written a study server at aerolith.org using HTML5/new technologies and am going to add multiplayer soon with Websockets. My time is very limited due to my job, but I'd be willing to help with an effort to recreate something like this amazing site for Scrabble. But again the main issue is the copyright/trademark issue, and the fact that EA has the rights to online Scrabble in North America. If anyone has any ideas it would be awesome.
The only site I ever visit while I work.
Whenever I get stuck on something (multiple times per day), I take a lichess break. If I win, I feel better and get back to work. I never lose because as soon as the computer catches me with a fork or a pin, I angrily close my browser and get back to work. Either way it's good.
That's the best testimonial I ever read about lichess. Permission to quote requested.
Absolutely.
You never Google stuff for your work? Never read online reference manuals / docs, like cppreference.com, docs.python.org or whatever language rocks your boat?
I must mention that it was fixed, indeed, years ago.
Is that comment that lichess.org is the second largest chess site on the web true?
I was happy to learn of its existence last year when you mentioned on twitter that you were using Mithril.js, and I never realized how big lichess had become since then.
Great work!
You don't play via the website though. Same for other chess servers (FICS, etc).
On Chess.com I can log on and click a "find me a 10+0 game" and I just get a game. On Lichess, as far as I can tell, I have to scan the list of games, compare them to my rating (which I can't even see on the main screen, and don't trust at all since it swung +150 points on my first game..), and then pick from the list. It's a huge mental barrier on "playing a quick game of chess".
I also really wish that the chess UI on lichess showed me what pieces each player had captured. It seems to.. sometimes.. but not always, which is confusing. They constantly disappear. Also, the pieces that show up above/below the move list on the right side both appear as black pieces (when they actually show up), rather than of the appropriate color, so the display could be read as both "pieces you have captured" and "pieces you have lost". I'm sure I could get used to this but it's confusing as a new user.
Or you can just host a game and wait for someone to find you?
(Though, as I mentioned, I still don't trust my rating at all since my first ranked win gave me 150 rating points. Chess.com's give closer to 8-20, as I recall, which is much more credible. Specifically, I don't trust that my rating varied by 150 in one game, but the range of ratings I see on the front page is only about 1500-1800.. so it seems as though I just skipped almost the entire range in a single game.)
It's likely that you've played quite a few games on Chess.com already.
No thanks.
2. Playing against stronger players is not that bad, this a way to became a stronger player.
I don't really want to have to select rating ranges. I don't know what ratings to play against, and I definitely don't want to think about it every time I make a game.
I'm half-joking but hey, that would seriously be awesome. Talking mainly about ease of use.
Pandanet
The one problem with everything free philosophy and relying on donations is that top players are unlikely to play on the site (see FICS vs ICC battles of early 90s where ICC by paying and giving affiliate sales quickly rose to be the dominant force in early net chess despite the questionable morality of taking over original ICS).
This presents a problem for someone who has problems getting a good game on lichess.
At 2400 on lichess, I either have to play masses of 2100-2200s or computer cheaters. As an FM I've played a few FMs and I think one IM on lichess.
On commercial sites (the top 3 being chess.com, ICC, and Playchess) there are incentives to bring in GM caliber players.
Again, if you just want a good amateur game, then lichess is a fine choice.
Very well done!