Why wasn't handwriting recognition a big success?
Why wasn't handwriting recognition a big success?
http://img.informer.com/screenshots/5045/5045272_3.jpg
Notice that "keypad" in the bottom right corner. That's the "on-screen custom keyboard" you're talking about.
But this isn't very convenient:
1. There are a lot of symbols. So many that the keyboard is divided up into six sub-keyboards. Unless you know the program well, it's a bit of a mystery where exactly to find the right symbol.
2. And it's actually more complicated than that because some of the symbols are actually modifiers of other symbols. For several of the symbols you see (sharp, natural, flat, dot, tie) you can't actually draw them independently, they only exist as attachments to another note. So the keypad works differently when you are dealing with those symbols.
3. Plenty of marks aren't even covered by the keypad and its six panels. For those you have to go searching in the numerous other menus in the app. You start getting a Microsoft Word-like problem: how do you design menu bars that show all the options without taking up the whole screen.
I really think it would be easier to draw what you mean -- if the app is actually good at recognizing what you mean.
The ability to write as you think/feel it and have the computer handle digitization is a big step, and hopefully allows composers to just write, without working around their software's limitations.
I'd like to see this app being used for something simple-ish like the Prelude in C from Bach's WTC. The usual notation shows three independent lines - two in the left hand - and I don't know if the app has enough awareness of context to make that easy.
I haven't used Sibelius or Finale for a while, but last time I looked you had to enter the lines separately. You couldn't just "write" them in one pass and make them fit together, as you can on paper.
As for handwriting - I don't think anyone really wants it. QWERTY is faster, easier to read, and more accurate.
Symbol input (math, music, etc) is different. But for basic text, I don't think there's any clear advantage to using handwriting for input.
You get a sense of the experience watching the video: quarter notes are just a short diagonal line, all the note stems are perfectly vertical.
In a way, this problem space is perfect fodder for automation. If a musician can sightread off of your chicken-scratched sheet music, the computer will be able to do a decent job too.
'A quick slanted line is what StaffPad wants for quarter notes and smaller; simple circles or ovals for half notes and whole notes.'
http://www.sibeliusblog.com/news/staffpad-is-a-music-handwri...