Ignoring the obvious laughable fallacies (" Since I live and breathe the Internet, I’m more adept to make better judgements of companies than the market."), I'm suprised you and your business partner both read and reviewed this and still felt comfortable posting this.
At first I wonder, how much research could you have possibly done if you put a company on your list that was acquired last year? Then I saw your response to someone suggesting Skype "I love Skype. Adding it now." A clear example of the amount of research and methodology you've employed to come up with these weak sublists. You've simply chosen companies with products you like and have listed them, arriving at conclusions no different than that of a casual user of the internet.
In the end, you finish up with a facile paragraph: "I am very optimistic about the Internet." Amazing!
"I am certain that at least 100 other companies will be on this list in 10 years time " Really? You are certain that in 10 years at least 100 more companies will fall within your classifications of winners, neutral, unstable, or failures? That's quite a bet you are making!
"and most likely even my favorites will disappear." What? You just gave a list of companies you project to be successes (great job on noting that rising star "google" by the way) and now you are telling us some of them may disappear? Have you even read what you wrote?
"The Internet is still in its infancy, and there is still room for tremendous growth. It certainly is an exciting time to be in the industry!" Tell me less.