Hacker News Reader

Comment by bane | Hacker News Reader

I've usually found that when metrics become the focus of an organization, the organization optimizes around gaming the metrics. This happens in companies, volunteer groups, communist dictatorships, capitalist paradises, everywhere.

Something inevitably gives.

I also have a hard time believing that this idea is floating putting a piece of paper on everybody's desks, in 2015.

View on HN

I use paper all of the time to present information. It's remarkably effective and easy to do vs. screwing around with dashboard apps, accessing various data sources, etc.

To avoid the horrific costs of printing things on color, I've seen millions wasted on BI tools and other fluffery. 10 minutes of excel and 10 pieces of paper does the job.

That is only a single paper though. Now you must replicate and distribute that paper to every person in the company...ASAP.

The consumer of metrics that I give a hoot about are a few key team members, the COO and CTO. I go to "# of copies" hit 6, and I'm done.

I'm not a total luddite btw, Most of what I do is project based or operations in transition. So metrics are either evolving or we don't have a consensus over what matters. So the building process of automated dashboard isn't a high roi activity.

An investigation of UK, specifically English, education policy and practice over the last decade or so would provide evidence for your position. The thing that gives is time spent in dialogue with individual students.

Paper? We have dashboards. And colour printing is a bit expensive.

This is one of the tricks of metrics. They are made to be gamed. So, in picking the metrics to measure, you are picking the game you want your team to play. Trying to cover all metrics is silly, as you context switch between too many things.

If you can't measure what's important, then what you do measure becomes important

What gets measured gets managed. - Peter Drucker.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com