European data protection ruling could impact Facebook and Google
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
"The ECJ ruled* Thursday that if a company operates a service in the native language of a country, and has representatives in that country, then it can be held accountable by the country’s national data protection agency despite not being headquartered in the country."
*http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessioni...
I think this is great news.
It's certainly possible to provide a site in the native language of a country without having a presence in that country, especially if the language in the target country is similar (ie., US and UK).
Authority might try to block the site, but that is pretty difficult without building a Great Wall of some sort.
But then isn't this the same ECJ that invented the right to be forgotten?
The tech\corporate\spy world is moving so fast that we need experimentation at smaller scales to discover the right types of privacy and information law. Implementation of "right to be forgotten" on a small scale might have helped find a better implementation before being rolled out at a broad scale. Delegating law making to states lets this experimentation and evolution happen. You can add you own start-up metaphor.
If I look at the US, the federal level seems to be a quagmire and prevent progress (health, education, guns) compared to the rest of the world. However, when states set law independently, the rate of change seems much faster (gay marriage, drug laws). I can't see the US minting a new citizen right at the expense of corporations at the federal level - this is tragic. However, it might if states led the way first.
"Business friendly" and "protectionism" read like talking points from a corporate PR machine. I see the EU pursuing citizen's rights for the modern world when the US is stagnant / regressing.
This was an action which fell under the European Privacy Directive, which is EC-wide but implemented by different laws in different countries. All countries involved are EC countries.
This sort of thing comes up all the time in the US, where courts have to deal with companies from another state.