I met you in the rain on the last day of 1972
boston.craigslist.org
boston.craigslist.org
Jack Shafer wrote about this sort of thing regarding a David Sedaris flap a few years ago:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/press_box/20...
Should we consider all fiction works in this way?
(Nowadays it's all ridiculous sex stories, which somehow ends up being an improvement.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_sale:_baby_shoes,_never_wo...
One sentence I find very profound is this: the prospect of suicide was suddenly less appealing than the prospect of discovering what had happened in that restaurant.
The other takeaway is this: do not go to the bathroom. Do not leave. Do not take your eyes off the object of your interest for one second, or she might leave and you'll never see her again.
If the object of your interest wants to leave, I'm not sure imposing yourself on it is the best way to keep it around.
It is depressing. Its only redeeming quality is the fact that it's obviously fake.
Just an impression of what goes through me at this point in my life when I read that story. I recognise your take on it as well. It's just that I learned that looking at life like that did not make me happy in the end. And that the feeling of intellectual victory was without substance.
The character forgot his guilt because a hot girl spoke to him. That's 90% of what we know about her, that she's sexual attractive to him - in fact, that she's the most attractive girl he's ever seen. This is not a story about "human connections" or finding "acceptance" for one's past - heck, they didn't even talk about Vietnam. This is a story about overcoming sexual arousal through guilt. No, about sexual arousal overriding guilt.
And that is why it doesn't matter that the girl left. What "redeemed" him was not the girl, it was his own boner. "You're with me still", indeed.
When we're sad, we often get caught in a sort of mental loop. Sometimes getting attention from a pretty girl steals our attention and helps bump us out of it. It's something about the human condition. It's relatable, and that's probably why people tend to find the story beautiful.
There's nothing inherently good or bad about that. Your disgust is fueled by the same physical processes that underly the warm fuzzies felt by others.
First of all it is human to feel suicidal for whatever reason from time to time. These times are lonely and just meeting a new person and having a normal conversation, no matter how short, can make a huge difference, to 'snap out of it'.
The life force is strong even with those determined to kill themselves - conscious decision making to end it all is over-ruled by some mystery hypervisor deep down in the brain. Guy snatches a few moments with one of those pretty girls that have been ignoring him for all of his life - what do you expect? Life is worth living, after all and 'I must kill myself' gets over-ruled for another day. That isn't about fscking or consuming, that is just about being a fragile human being and wanting someone to love.
Secondly, we rarely tell stories exactly as the events happened. With each telling of a story we learn what is important to the story and what is not. We omit facts that are not entirely necessary to be told. Right now there are refugees WALKING all the way from Syria to new lives in Europe. Along the way some of these refugees might have been given a bus ride to the outskirts of a city, somewhere along the way. If such a bus ride is a few miles and yet they have walked hundreds of miles, or maybe a thousand miles, are they 'lying' by claiming to have walked all the way? Are their stories fake, their epic walk undermined by a short bus ride somewhere in the midst of an epic walk?
In this instance, the author may not have looked for the woman every day for a year. He probably had some public holidays, health problems, bad weather or whatever along the way, so that part may not be entirely true.
You may have found this story depressing but I suspect you are in a minority.
That's not in the story! It would at least have made a modicum of sense if he was a desperate loner who was going to kill himself over his feelings of absolute social and romantic rejection, but none of that is in the story.
The writer has some skills. The flow and efficiency would earn marks as a school assignment!
"scaled the hill with its golden dome, and meandered into that charming labyrinth divided by Hanover Street"
It might seem simple, but in those few words a lot of information is communicated.
"Ironically, the torture of your abandonment seemed to swallow my self-loathing"
Nicely put! Again, top marks.
As an aside, I've noticed over the years that programmers make good writers. Wit, efficiency, confidence. Obviously excelling at technical subject matter, but even so, sometimes it's entertaining. I wonder if the reverse is true? That good writers and literature-heads make good programmers (if they tried). As in, creative code, efficient code, structured etc.
Oh, come on. I can't tell if you're being ironic or clumsy, but if it's the later I strongly disagree. This is fantastic writing, much better than what we read everywhere everyday; in school it would warrant to take the teacher's place.
That said, it's only 1000 words. Don't get too excited.
By "school" I mean maybe college, a dedicated writing class. Who knows, who cares, but don't underestimate the talent of young writers motivated by viral glory!
But yeah... it's a good one-hit-wonder.
Fake or not, if you are saying people are only fun if they admire such a bunch of a wannabe-romantic story and go "aaaaaawwwww", then I am really sorry.
Is it really that hard, even in this supposedly liberalized day and age, to have a conversation about these outdated romantic notions?
I'm not claiming the story is real, but just presenting a counter view to the above. You seem to be assuming that:
A: This is real memories, given the story he's obviously thought about that encounter a lot. So, it's hardly been 40 years, it's been constantly repeated in his mind - also evolving. Some of the details might be wrong, some only carry the sentiment of what he believed he would have felt at that time. If, 40 years ago, he heard the same story he told now he might barely recognize it. Given that he contemplated suicide and add to that that he believes this be the turning point for getting past that (whether that is true nor not is irrelevant). It is no surprise that he has strong feelings and vivid memories from it.
B: Since when is memory organized by meaningfulness? Also, what is meaningful?
I'm not even 40 years old but, as an example, I could tell you in ridiculous detail of a presentation I did in school with two friends of mine when I was 11 years old. (~20 years ago), I could tell you about memories of the notes that we had for the presentation (handwritten notes written on the printed document we had produced) - I remember some of the images we used (and how they were completely irrelevant to the topic). Is that in any sense meaningful? God no. Is my memory crystal clear? Not at all, for one there are huge gaping holes that I either won't mention or that I must interpolate to get at (I do remember the overall context and sentiment, from that I could just assume (and believe) everything else was ordinary), but as an observer you'll mostly forgive that because I can tell you the color and the shape I used to circle a specific note on that document - and how I messed it up and rather than circling the note a lot of it ended up on the outside of it. Or how we messed up the order of the overhead sheets etc.
And that is about a boring presentation that I've not given much thought on, not a life-changing event that had a very sudden and thought-provoking ending.
I learned Latin for 3 or 4 years, and from the top of my head could come up with maybe 100 latin words. But when I look at a latin text we translated back than, it comes back bit by bit. I might remember the ending of a meaningless story I translated 10 years ago in a rush before class started. Maybe I will remember specific mistakes I made in translating the text, or I will remember the picture that was next to the text in the course book. It is remarkable that memory is able to do. Granted, we know that a good part part of these memories are in fact incorrect. But as long as I don't have to talk to a court or write a memoir, it does not bother me.
B, you completely missed the point. Just completely missed the point to read that sentence the way you wanted to, "many of the details are completely meaningless to the premise that is presented" has nothing to do with memory. That's why it starts with "Even if we believed someone could have a memory this crystal clear...." So why are you even bothering to argue about memory with me when I gave the memory the benefit of the doubt in my argument?
As I said, I just wanted to comment on that. And that because of the way you gave the memory the benefit of doubt, considering the circumstances anything else could have been equally suspicious.
Also, it's not hard to imagine he doesn't really believe he'll find her and typing it up serves a purpose of its own. It could also be something he just wanted to share.
Again, I'm not saying it's real, just that I didn't think the arguments I commented on was particularly convincing. Sorry?
Lighten up. Just see the human animal as it is - warts and all - without judging it.
No, the point was not the act of listening, it was that the girl was hot.
There are plenty of war veterans, especially from WWI and WWII, who didn't speak to even their own families about the torment they were going through. Many veterans to this very day don't seek help and bottle up their trauma. Australia's national broadcaster, the ABC, has an excellent podcast about this on their Big Ideas website, perhaps you should take the time to listen to it [1].
Your comments are ill-informed and frankly unhelpful. The rate of suicide for veterans is twice the rate of the civilian population. A cursory Google search would lead you to Wikipedia which has a well sourced article detailing the rates and research into the problem [2]. You might also want to look at the PTSD article [3].
1. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bigideas/shell-...
2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_veter...
3. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posttraumatic_stress_disorde...
I read the story as random kindness and forming a connection with another human saved a life. The moral for me is a smile, a kind word, a 30 minute conversation can impact people in significant ways.
Very sad story.
And so after decades, one party went to the arranged meeting point with great anticipation having told their family about the story, etc. But the other party didn't turn up. Eventually the reporter tracked them down, and they couldn't remember anything about the original meeting.
Unfortunately, I've never been able to find this story again, despite spending quite some time looking! But, going by this story, I think it's quite possible that often when something like this happens it's far more significant to one person than the other, partly because some people have more drama in their lives than others.
http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/lost/novels.html has tips on how to find books. Maybe some of the same places would have suggestions on how to find the article?
it doesn't take much to stop most death by suicide.
The beginning of the piece has such wonderful and evocative detail, it is either a genuine memory or well researched fiction or some mix of the two.
Unlike other cynics here, I don't think it can be easily dismissed as merely "Wow, our gonads sure drive us." But then I believe we are spirits in the material world and I have been sustained through many hard things because of strange and kind encounters myself. Edit: Also, my father and ex were both soldiers and I have known many military personnel. So, there's that.
It's part of his 'The Elephant Vanishes' short story collection.
https://www.reddit.com/r/boston/comments/3n86wi/i_met_you_in...
https://boingboing.net/2015/10/02/the-greatest-craigslist-mi...
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2013/08/the...
http://data-freeyork.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/...
You should be able to search all Government surveillance cams for your own history.
Here we have an excellent example of something that needs to be slid into the folder marked "In defense of the internet".
I don't have any sympathy for this man who's had just about the best possible life he could have, given what he did.
I'll bet there are plenty of prisoners serving life for murder who would also like to meet some old flame but don't have the freedom to post on Craigslist.
...except your summarized version also triggers an emotional response, does it not? Perhaps less deceptive. (or is it?)