I'm glad Soylent works for some people, at least.
I unfortunately didn't get my original Soylent 1.1 in time for the trip, but how I wish I'd had it.
I don't use Soylent on a daily basis, but I always take it camping or on extended trips. I'd rather have a decently balanced food source (nothing is perfect) then eat greasy fast-food or just go hungry so I can make an extra 100 miles of travel before sunset.
And what's the problem with that? Surely you didn't travel via motorcycle complaining that motorcycles are "too slow" for the trip. It was an integral part of your traveling experience and without it it would've been completely different.
Eating is a normal part of life. Any inconvenience in it is exactly part of a human experience, much like what you wanted with the trip. If your bike broke down for that extra 100 miles or if it was too cold in camping it wasn't "an issue", it was just life. You could have solved those two issues by traveling by plane and staying in hotels, but that's exactly the kind of convenience that you wanted to avoid.
Because that's often time I'd rather spend doing other things.
People are pretty capable of deciding that for themselves. No need to try to convince anyone what kind of appetite they should have for ceremony and the, deep voice, "human experience."
I don't get Soylent's appeal, and I don't understand what unmet needs in the market it is meeting. My best guess, people that want to feel like they are "hacking" eating. Which is really just different marketing for a meal replacement shake.
Other replies have given me additional information which I'm going to go over. Your's was setting up a straw man argument.
files.soylent.com/pdf/soylent-nutrition-facts-2-0-en.pdf
Soylent is still low on protein for my tastes because I lift weights and I'm shooting for at least 150g a day.
1. It is way more expensive than Soylent powder.
2. It has too much sugar and too little of everything else. If you scale the calories to 2000 you'll have 400% of your daily recommended value of some nutrients and 50% of others.
3. It comes in annoying sizes (one bottle is only 240 calories, wtf?).
If you go into a health food store like whole foods, there's a dozen or so other meal replacement options very similar to Soylent. Some soy free, some with exotic herbs and algae, some high protein, and all within the same price range.
You could file this all under marketing and not be technically wrong, but it makes a real difference in the experience as a consumer.
Here in the USA the modest apartments I was renting more than 30 years ago had dishwashers. However, I didn't always use the dishwasher because it's hard for one person to generate enough dishes a day to make it worthwhile to run. Especially if frozen food made for microwave heating is a large part of your diet.
I know some people like cooking. That's fine for them. I like coding and I do that for fun. No enjoy-cooking-people I know want to write software. Different strokes for different folks.
We need to get out of the mindset of some kinds of work being "noble". When I was growing up it was "noble" to clean dishes by hand, repair your house yourself and repair your car yourself.
Now that I'm an adult, most people I know have "failed" and are lazily hiring specialists or using machines for those once-noble tasks. And some are very successful in their lives despite that failing! </s>
I enjoy cooking, I enjoy eating what I cook and I write software because I want to.
When I think about it, I'm actually a bit sad I can't taste my own code :7
My doctor recommended Ensure but I later switched to soylent.