Bernie Sanders rivals Clinton in fundraising
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
By all measures, Sanders is a REAL candidate. He's got more support and more money than most of the jokers on the Republican side who are getting respectful treatment from their party and the press.
Yet Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other party insiders are doing their best to exclude the IA/NH front-runner from getting his message out to Democratic voters.
This doesn't mean much in itself. He's one of three candidates, compared to ~15 Republican candidates. It's almost mathematically certain that two of the three Democratic candidates will have more support that 'most of' the Republicans, regardless of their ideology.
It would be meaningful if he didn't have that level of support, given that there are only two other choices (and that practically nobody has even heard of one of the other two).
Pretty sure that's six declared candidates: Clinton, Sanders, O'Malley, Chaffee, Webb and Lessig.
This treatment of non-establishment (or non-conformist) politicians (Sanders being one case) is just a symptom of this medium-term trend.
[1] http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/electio...