Show HN: An interactive map of restaurants reviewed by the New Yorker
newforkermap.com
newforkermap.com
I'm pushing to provide public APIs, and this helps demonstrate why.
Of course, you (or anyone else here) is welcome to come and build it for real (and argue your case for/against dieresis) with direct access to the data.
If you'd like to reëngineer this for TNY, take a peek:
Just want to say I appreciated this :)
I can vouch that our team is very awesome.
We allocate time for open source projects, provide a budget for conferences, have a relaxed working environment, and have a very diverse team.
If you are interested, please shoot us a message!
Maybe they should rename it The Manhattanite, or maybe The Manhattanite, Preferably Below 14th Street.
In Manhattan every single address ends with "New York NY" and in Brooklyn every address ends in "Brooklyn NY", but in Queens the addresses correspond to the individual "cities" or rather neighborhoods that comprise the borough. So instead of "Queens NY" addresses end with "Long Island City NY" or "Flushing NY" or "Jamaica NY" despite being in the city of NYC.
So maybe this side project, which presumably is based on scraping the data from the New Yorker site, doesn't have all the various areas of Queens coded into it.
Or maybe it does, I'm just speculating wildly without actually looking into the matter.
If you slice off the more residential areas, of course you'll wind up with a big population with a smaller level of cultural activity, because cultural activity is often concentrated away from residential areas: people commute from Queens to Manhattan, and then they stay there to eat/drink. That's an oversimplification that doesn't apply to everyone... but that's the broad pattern.
For reference, according to http://a816-restaurantinspection.nyc.gov/RestaurantInspectio... Manhattan has about twice as many eateries as Queens. But that doesn't tell the whole picture, because a greater proportion of those Queens eateries are likely to be neighbourhood places, diners, delis: places that the New Yorker is obviously not going to review.
So yeah, there's probably some bias... but destination restaurants are concentrated in Lower Manhattan. That's the way it is. You should expect New Yorker reviews to reflect that.
Now, if you could show there was a causal relationship between a bad review and a restaurant closing, that'd be really interesting.
A half-and-half view works fairly nicely in NY because of its oblong shape.
As another addition...you could probably pull NYT reviews fairly easily (via the article API http://developer.nytimes.com/docs/read/article_search_api_v2, or just scraping the restaurants page), and they do have a star-system of their own. I feel they'd be much more likely to issue a takedown notice, though.
edit: Though I notice you're actually using Yelp's API within their TOS [1]...i.e. freshly requesting the Yelp data with each request and not caching it...so my suggestion would be significantly harder than if you did just a straight pull of the data and organized it on your side...so ignore my TOS-infringing ideas :)
I'm just curious if you would mind divulging a little bit about how you managed to make this work? Are you just scraping the New Yorker site and sticking them onto the map, or is there something else going on?
0 - view-source:http://newforkermap.com/
Yup, just scraping. Then hitting Google Geocoding API for lat/lng and the Yelp API for reviews and open/closed status.
That is what a restaurant reviewer should write about. A report on what someone ate, or what they saw, is not a review. There should be an emotional ride. That's what a review is.
If you want to read some of the best restaurant reviews ever written, search for Jay Rayner's work in the Observer. He is masterful at writing about restaurants (and food, and wine). They're a joy.
A useful review should include some objective analysis. Ignoring details that marred your visit but wouldn't likely impact future patrons for instance; instead of wallowing in them gleefully.
Also a good reviewer should understand and adjust for their own emotional state going into the deal. You have a bad day; you write a scathing review - how is that useful to anybody?
So, what a review is, is a lot more than disgorging a personal emotional odyssey in print. A professional would write a carefully weighed analysis including a dispassionate component to factor out their own irrelevant biases. Would include those elements that were well crafted, even if they didn't hit home with the reviewer on the particular night they visited. Would resist cheap jabs, which are the review equivalent of click-bait.
The Yelp API provides data on whether a restaurant is still in business and is fairly accurate.