Not directly related to the article content, but did anyone notice the odd caption/credit under the top article image? It reads "Source: Google images approved for reuse." which I haven't seen before.

A quick reverse image search reveals that it's by this guy on Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/topgold/6273248505/) and carries a CC Attribution license, which this article is clearly not in compliance with. It's a publisher owned website an you would think they know a bit about copyright.