Hacker News Reader

Comment by harryh | Hacker News Reader

I certainly agree that Typesafe (the company behind Scala) has hugely underinvested in tooling.

The fact that they still (afaik) recommend sbt as a build tool is telling.

I happen to find sbt one of the few build tools (together with lein) that are decent enough. Do you have any particular reason for your dislike?

It doesn't work with large codebases. Or even very well with medium sized ones.

What size are we talking? I've had no issues with SBT on a 20k line codebase.

I'm using it on a 100k line codebase without issue. What problems are you having?

i'm loving sbt, but still on projects above > 100 dependencies it gets really really slow to download it, while with gradle (even i dislike it) it is way way faster.

This is probably SBT's greatest weakness and Gradle's biggest strength, relatively. I've never run in to this personally, probably because I'm use Nexus[1] as a repository cache. My understanding is that the underlying problem is a limitation of the dependency resolution library they use, Ivy[2]. Gradle used to use this but at some point wrote their own dependency resolution library. There are some improvements in recent versions of SBT but you have do a little configuration. See here[3] for more details.

[1] http://www.sonatype.com/nexus/product-overview

[2] http://ant.apache.org/ivy/

[3] https://www.typesafe.com/blog/improved-dependency-management...

I also thought of introducing Nexus, but since we are only 3 Devlopers (yet, we searching though) it didn't too much sense. I also I hoped for Nexus 3 (but since I'm waiting over half a year now, we might introduce Nexus 2).

Oh and we also using the Cache, when working on newer sbt projects.

> It doesn't work with large codebases.

This type of general conclusion isn't, by itself, particularly useful in discussion; a lot more useful would be presenting a summary of the specific facts and experiences that lead you to this conclusion.

sbt isn't very good for copy&paste build masters, which was pretty much all of us who had to setup Ant and Maven projects. It demands a certain amount of investment in learning its core concepts, but OMIGOD it's sooooo good once you know what you're doing. I've extracted so much common setup to hierarchies of plugins that I can setup our company's most common usecases for new projects in 3 or so lines of code.

One of the big problems I had with it (stopped using it about a year ago) was that they changed those core concepts so frequently.

I had code routinely stop working during point releases. I couldn't justify spending that much time on my build code.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com