But it would still be anarchic (without the laws of human psychology and social interactions at least). However, it would be an algorithm, and thus, in its broadest sense, a method.
I think most scientist would agree that science involves method, indeed most science involve multiple, nested methods.
But I think most scientists would be very skeptical of any claim to have fully codified a single scientific method, much less a theory of all creative endeavors.
So your link seems like bending the stick way too far the other way.