Why Public and Private Market Valuations Are Different
mahesh-vc.com
mahesh-vc.com
This is great data, and a lesson for where an early stage company's valuation is headed as a company matures.
Also a reminder why VCs have a liquidation preference. At early stages they're willing to pay higher multiples assuming rapid growth continues. But they're protected if it doesn't.
In an illiquid environment with tons of collusion and principal / agent problems incentivising towards higher prices (and thus greater AUM), you'll tend to see prices diverge from those in a market open to anyone who thinks they can play the game better.
For conventional companies, reality is different. WalMart is what it is, nobody is going to pay a 100x multiple for it.
If you are talking about a secondary retail market - which is what the NYSE and NASDAQ are - then that is true, but misses the point.
There is an actual market and it's within private finance both primary and secondary. Angels, VC's, LP's and other companies are the regulation sanctioned participants in this market. Just because it's a smaller market doesn't mean it isn't a market.
>The private valuations are mostly sales fluff and politicking about dilution.
Not true. Those valuations are the basis for real cash based investments or mergers/acquisitions.
Overvalued? Yeah, for sure. Only game in town, too, until the revolution.
A lot of it was a consequence of Fed's policies mainly with ZIRP and QE. From that angle, overvaluation of public companies is more likely than the latter.
And, if startups are 'less undervalued'~'more overvalued' than public companies, it only means they're more prone to volatility, busts and bloodbaths.