Apple stock plunges $30. Sky IS falling.
finance.google.com
finance.google.com
http://www.thestreet.com/pf/newsanalysis/media/10399930.html
Talks about how Apple consistently sandbags its estimates, so it can blow through them later. It sounds very much like Steve Jobs's MO:
"Jobs is incredibly and famously promotional when unveiling products, but when he talks numbers he has always been just the opposite -- a conservative player, sandbagging like there is no tomorrow. His dual nature throws people off."
But it looks like underpromise/overdeliver has bitten the stock.
Time to buy!
Time to buy!"
--Not really. It just sound that the market is saying: "in time a recession, people have hard time to justify spending 1,700 in a useless laptop, or more money on expensive stuff." Since apple represents the medium and higher end spectrum on personal computers, people will be much much more price sensitive to pricing.
The cheapest usable windows laptop, about $400. The cheapest Mac, about $800, making it almost a luxury good. In hard times, it is the luxury stocks that gett the beatings. Apple will have to either sell less laptops and gadgets (fewer people will be able to afford or justify the extra $$), or drop the prices (and margins) to the current products.
Heck, even in the good times, The CEO gets the macbook pro. everybody else gets dells. I would bet up to 43 cents the CEO continues to get the shineyest newest toys ever year, while grunt staff's computers are kept in service an extra 6 months to two years to save on costs.
Now, if you'd said they make their money from ipods, then I'd completely agree.
"The company is lowballing the Street on the March quarter, but this is not a good environment to lowball the market"
...given how pretty much the whole sector is taking a dive today on recession fears.
Seriously, who cares. Markets move in more than one direction.
I bought appl shares at $130 just 6 months ago. 6 months of gain is lost, not 3 years.
Too bad I didn't have the cojones (or the faith in investor intelligence) to short it.
That's why economists are famous for predicting Five of the Last Three Recessions -- they know that a dip is necessary, but not when it's going to start.
Apple laptops are nowhere near saturated. The downsides of owning a non pc have greatly been reduced if not eliminated lately. I think apple laptops could really take off.
The iphone is also nowhere near saturated. Many people are waiting for the next release or waiting until their current contracts are over to get one.
Also, the apple tv if done right, especially with the movie rental service could become the next ipod.
iPhone isn't saturated, but I'm still bearish on that. And extremely on the TV. Cable VOD has a box in everyone's home already.
Steve Jobs has done an amazing job turning around the company and much of this enthusiasm is warranted. However, the stock got way ahead of itself.
I considered shorting the stock also, but that is just way too risky. A stock only has to double to wipe out the entire investment. And, if a stock is already irrationally high, it could very well go substantially higher in the short term. However, put options may be a good way to bet on the downside while limiting risk.
At this point, I do think they are pretty close to an appropriate valuation. If they get another hit with their iPhone and their computer market share increases, they will do very well. But, I think this is far from a sure bet.
A friend of mine at Apple reminded me yesterday that they made 300m on just the interest of their war chest. A few years ago, they were having trouble making that much just on their products.
The drop may be caused partially by irrational behavior, but in poker we say that even the blind squirrel finds an acorn eventually. In this case, irrational behavior partially corrected opposing irrational behavior.
That's evidence that they'll stick around, but it's a bad sign when a company makes most of their money from depositing cash in the bank. It's irrational to value $1 of Apple-cash at much more than $1 if the main selling point is that they won't spend it: you can do just as well putting your own money in the bank, and save the brokerage commission.
Net Sales | Profit
1996 $ 9.8B | -$0.8B
1997 $ 7.1B | -$1.0B
1998 $ 5.9B | $0.31B
1999 $ 6.1B | $0.60B
2000 $ 8.0B | $0.79B
2001 $ 5.4B | -$0.03B
2002 $ 5.7B | $0.07B
2003 $ 6.2B | $0.06B
2004 $ 8.3B | $0.27B
2005 $13.9B | $1.33B
2006 $19.3B | $1.99B
2007 $24.0B | $3.50B
*Data from SEC database:
Also, it's "only" down $16.75 at the close.