> Scheme is a Lisp.
No, it isn't.
> I've never met anyone who disagrees.
Now you have.
No, it isn't.
> I've never met anyone who disagrees.
Now you have.
He didnt do more than just claim it.
> You might supply some reasons why you think Scheme isn't a Lisp.
So you want a negative proof without providing a positive proof first?
> That would make a much more informative post.
So why didnt you remind the previous poster of this, instead of reminding me?
I replied to you because, while an unsupported claim is regrettable, an unsupported denial takes you all the way into "Is too! Is not!" 5-year-old-style argument. iak8god started down that road; your reply went further down it.
It also seemed to me that your attitude was sharper than iak8god's. Your reply to me did not change that opinion.
> So you want a negative proof without providing a positive proof first?
Yes. I want you to try to be better than the person you're replying to, rather than trying to be at least as bad.
Do you need more "proof" of this than Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_%28programming_language... ?