The headline 'Obama administration quietly rejected ways to bypass smartphone encryption' would be more true and less sensational.
I said nothing about not reporting. It's the distorted headlines laced with innuendo that are damaging.
I said nothing about not reporting. It's the distorted headlines laced with innuendo that are damaging.
WaPo's headline was in the past tense and doesn't state anything else, so obviously nothing went beyond exploring. It's not distorted at all.