China's Copycat Jet Raises Questions About F-35
defenseone.com
defenseone.com
If it has a pilot inside - it is obsolete. A good 30-40% of the plane's weight goes to ensure the pilot mostly survive.
The UCAV/UCAS (aka UAV fighter jets for dogfighting) is still a very new concept and hasn't been proven in a battlefield environment yet. In fact, the USAF cancelled the X-45 UCAV demonstrator project even after it succeeded at pretty much everything they asked of it. The technology to really do some of these things has only matured in the past 5 or less years, and having it in milspec fielded gear in another 10 is possible, but still quite ambitious.
As someone who has 480+ combat flight hours flying missions all over Iraq, I call BS on your comment.
[1] http://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/browse-career-and-job...
Things like this are what I'm referring to: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/boeing-drone-laser-we...
The anti-small swarm lasers are already in active duty on a few newer Naval warships. In the 10 years time you mention for a possible ww3, not only will airborne lasers be viable, they'll be commonplace. So again, no I don't think that's really going to be a big issue.
Also, if your idea did happen, it would be awful hard to defend a floating UAV 3d printing factory in the ocean. The US is slowly losing air superiority over the rest of the world, but there isn't a navy that would come close to even matching the might of the blue water US navy in 10 years, not by a long shot. Even China struggles with that.
It'd be even more hilarious if the Chinese stole the plans to the F-35 and produced it verbatim. They'd realize they would have wasted a great deal of espionage and manufacturing effort on producing the lamest fighter ever.
The Buran was basically a money pit for the USSR.