I feel much empathy for the Shred team but the story has a bunch of challenges buried within.
I feel much empathy for the Shred team but the story has a bunch of challenges buried within.
Why does everything have to be done on explicit contract basis? How can an altruistic act of one party (helping out after leaving the company for free) be turned against them!? Where will this end!? Will I have to get in writing that this was in no way meant as a bribe every if I ever pay a round of beer for a couple coworkers?
There should be protection in place that if people act in good faith they cannot easily be sued like this. And definitely this kind of victim blaming is not helping going in such direction.
When you're acting on good faith, asking for a formal contract should be seen as a totally normal request. If the other party is also acting on good faith.
This is basically a win/win situation. If they complain about such a simple request, they might be hiding something. And if they do agree to simply formalize the agreement, you're protected.
I've been burned by "good faith" before, and it changes you. By pointing out "rookie mistakes" maybe someone will read this and start taking these things a little bit more serious.
Of course on an ideal world, we'd be protected and shouldn't have to worry about it. But that's utopia for me