Facebook’s Restrictions on User Data Cast a Long Shadow
wsj.com
wsj.com
The article includes:
> hopes to salvage his project by asking Facebook for access to eight types of data, including photos in which a user is tagged. He hopes to reconstruct a person’s friend network by seeing who they socialize with through their photos. Dr. Crosier says he won’t be able to see the images themselves, just that a user was tagged and by whom.
I don't particularly want random researchers to know who I socialise with. If this researcher (who may or may not be well intentioned) can reconstruct my friendship network, so can anyone.
It's scary enough that Facebook has this information - it's even scarier that anyone with some Python skills and a basic understanding of APIs can get it too. I'm not often wont to praise Facebook, but I think in this case they are (reluctantly and finally) doing the right thing by restricting data access.
http://caseysoftware.com/blog/social-apis-for-social-evil
But in all seriousness, this is the logical progression. As long as all of those things are locked down, the likelihood of exporting your data to a rival platform - if there was one - is basically nil. Their goal was to become the center of gravity that pulls everyone in and now they're protecting that.
I believe the idea that users want to download their own copy of "their data" is a fallacy. Sure, the people here think in those terms but average users don't. Remember, these are the same people a generation ago would have though AOL was the Internet. They don't think in terms of "my data" and don't see the value of it.
Oh, and as an added bonus they block all competition from accessing their incredibly valuable social graph, securing their monopoly for the future.
From the FAQ[1]: It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.
And this is bad apparently...