Syrian war spurs first withdrawal from 'doomsday' Arctic seed vault
smh.com.au
smh.com.au
If they're planting the crops elsewhere just to get something going now that is not in storage, to replant later in Syria, then it makes sense.
The article doesn't explain it very well but this transfer is meant to restock an active agricultural seed bank, that distributes seeds to the region's farmers, from last resort cold storage. Once the seeds are planted and bred, more seeds will probably be sent back to cold storage to replenish what they took.
Edit: ICARDA [1], the requesting organization, is also decentralized by default with operations in almost a dozen countries so the seeds will be safe.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Center_for_Agr...
Enough already.
Reliability over convenience?
Which reminds me, I should test our backups again...
The whole point of having an Artic seed vault is passive failsafe: "Even if the power were to fail, the vault would stay frozen and sealed for at least 200 years."
As a nice benefit, since it's passive failsafe, it's also cheap to maintain.
Its possible that an entire population of one species' "archive" is being requested ,though hopefully they wouldnt do that because of the obvious risks.
The situation there is very serious. There are many economic refugees in this migratory wave but I don't believe many of them are from Syria.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Mosul,+Iraq/Beirut,+Lebanon/...