Meat has no such requirement. While it may not be good for you in the long term, you can survive purely on meat for decades.
Meat has no such requirement. While it may not be good for you in the long term, you can survive purely on meat for decades.
You can, if you have genetic variation that allows you to process the food.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/science/inuit-study-add...
And no, this is not a poverty issue. I work with some very successful expat Indian developers who are strict vegetarians.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/255701994_Prevalence...
B12 deficiency is prevalent in India
http://wfp.org/content/malnutrition-widespread-indian-childr...
> Roughly 42 percent of all Indian children under age 5 suffer from malnutrition, a sobering reminder of the persistence of poverty and hunger in the world’s largest democracy,
My city has a flourishing expat Sikh community who are largely (though not exclusively) vegetarian, they are for the most part robust and successful individuals.
To categorize vegetarians as intrinsically at risk of health issues needs evidence before I'll buy it. And I say this as a meat eater.