Life in Walter Segal's self-build 'anarchist' estate
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Not to mention that if you go to Russia or other parts of the former Soviet Union you can find lots of people with self-built houses made from bricks and various sorts of stone blocks covered with plaster, whose construction is very much life the average 30's pebble dash home in Britain. Minus the pebbles of course. Russians prefer smooth plaster and paint or decorative tiles.
Having participated in building the Canadian way, moving around long heavy timbers, I wonder if the European brick and block way is not superior for self-building. Much easier to lift one block into postion, than a long timber, or a prebuilt truss (crane required) or a prebuilt wall (half a dozen strong helpers required and they bear the risk of it falling on them if a mistake is made).
You can find it on some Cotswold manor houses. It's a bit disconcerting.
http://www.pebbledashing.com/why-use-pebbledashing.php
http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/pebbledash/pebb...
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/21/pebbleda...
On a practical level, this translates into things like much more modest foundations (poles instead of slab), a 60 cm grid system that is perpetuated throughout the house, plasterboard panels that get loosely fit instead of screwed on, an extremely simple but sturdy stair design, and more.
A more contemporary descendant seems to be http://irishvernacular.com .
The aesthetic is very 1980s US west-coast suburbia.
Several cities, seeing wood as a fire risk, even until this day have rules that forbid new wooden construction.
Then there's also the fact that streets are organised in a totally different way in many European cities. US visitors sometimes tell me they feel a bit claustrophobic in the streets of my native city. They _are_ quite a bit narrower than the average US street, and they're all townhouses built right next to one another.
Oh, and older generations seem to spontanuously associate wooden barracks with soldiers, prisoners of war and cheap post war emergency housing.
The tide is turning though, with wood and even straw building gaining in popularity year by year in many of the EU countries that I regularly visit...
[1] http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/sep/10/metroland-100-...
I live in northern England at about 1000' (fairly high by english standards). It rains a lot, and the rain tends to be more horizontal than vertical. Outside, untreated wood rots fast from the damp. Treated wood (e.g. windowframes) need repainting every 2nd year, and even so parts of them rot and need replacing every 25 years or so.
The houses near here are mostly 200-400 years old and built of local gritstone from quarries that are a few hundred yards away. The walls are as good as when they are built (the exteriors need re-pointing every ~40 years or so). The roofs (grey(stone) slate) need re-doing maybe every ~40 years when the timbers sag.
The buildings I have made (house extension, outbuildings) will still be standing 400 years from now.
The comments about shortage of timber might also have some validity - there were/are hardwoods here, but not much - unlike in the US or New Zealand, where you had large forests on your doorsteps.
doesn't feel very anarchist to me.