Posters of the golden age of Soviet cosmonauts
bbc.com
bbc.com
http://i.imgur.com/R6ouayv.jpg
is not just showing some random "elongated triangle".
The monument to "The Conquerors of Space" in Moscow (completed earlier):
It's not. Books are written by humans. You expect them to contain fiction or opinion. Pictures are taken by mechanical equipment with no agenda. "The camera never lies" etc. Obviously you can also stage a photograph unrepresentative of reality using techniques other than Photoshop, but the general expectation is that what you see in a photograph is what you would have seen with your own eyes if you had been there at the time.
But people also blame Photoshop when the problem is endemic. Only people with certain body types are hired in Hollywood. Then they have professional makeup artists and hair stylists make them up like a plastic doll, and then the pictures are photoshopped.
I suspect a big part of the reason the criticism is rarely taken seriously is that the proposed alternative of "normal" people is so obviously the wrong one. The average American is overweight and doesn't get enough exercise. People aren't going to want to look at that or be inspired to look like that, nor should they be. But the concept that the represented ideal physical appearance should resemble real athletes rather than stick figures or couch potatoes doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone.
Professionals use Photoshop when they disagree with the choices made by the on-camera chip, which is almost all of the time. Working from RAW, you can start fresh from something closer to raw sensor data and move the sliders for yourself. But those sliders have to be somewhere, effectively, and taking manual control of them (or overriding them with further transformations) doesn't make a photo less real. It's much more like copy-editing.
Most images you see are Photoshopped, but most of the editing (and all of the editing in journalism) is done with the intention of making the photo a more accurate representation of what the photographer saw.
Where you get people editing photos to make them more than what was really there is in art. Ansel Adams made choices in the darkroom motivated by aesthetics rather than accuracy, and he was damn good at it. I'm sure most glamour photographers would tell you they're engaged in a similar kind of artistry.
I'm less interested in fashion magazines creating unrealistic representations of the human form than why people believe these are credible ideals to aspire to, rather than mildly amusing curiosities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U (shows a woman's face)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17j5QzF3kqE (whole body, might be NSFW in the US)
The Photoshop manipulation has very little distortion — the camera engineer could not have produced these images, and the intention is entirely to make the image /less/ like what the photographer saw.
(It isn't just women. Yesterday's junk catalogue is illustrated with perfect-looking children and teenagers, sometimes with perfect-looking parents.)
[Edited links, I pasted them the wrong way around.]
http://danbc.neocities.org/index.html
The official list is here: http://www.carnegiegreenaway.org.uk/greenaway/
Some of these are out of print. Some are definitely showing their age.
Once you know the winning illustrators you can find their other books; or the other books of the authors; or the other books of the publisher.
Sadly these are just books in English. I'd be interested to know if there are equivalents for other languages.
Sadly, we barely even touch on NASA astronauts in school in the United States anymore. I just happen to love history and had parents that also did. I live in Neil Armstrong's home state and if you're ever in Ohio, there's a pretty interesting (and free) museum in his home town about his life and the Apollo Missions.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Race_(TV_series)
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_Air_and_Space_Museum
http://havecamerawilltravel.com/yuri-gagarin-monument-moscow
What I've written doesn't sound very clear but the point I'm trying to make is that even a misguided state can get some things right. That doesn't mean those things can only be got right by that kind of state, or that we should call for those things to be administered by such a state in perpetuity...
Both the US and former Soviet Union are culturally backwards in many ways, but each has aspects worth learning from. One can easily think of societies improved beyond both "theirs & ours," which also unleash imagination.
http://feldgrau.info/64-2010-09-02-12-20-17/5664-70s-soviet-...
https://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%...
Here's one example: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Soviet-Political-Posters-1917-80/dp/...
That one is lovely; A3 with reasonable printing. I'm a bit surprised there aren't more books. The posters cover a wide range of propaganda - including public health.